Live data from Hacker News

But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

fabiensanglard.net

1–10 of 25 posts

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#3
"The crucial question about a computer used to be "But can it run DOOM?". Later it became "But can it run Crysis?". These day it is "But can it run nytimes.com?". To which I am happy to report I was able to browse newspaper websites without burning myself."

Is there something I am missing with newer laptops? I have a 2008 Thinkpad x200, and I was able to do this just fine.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#4
> The advantage Apple still holds over its competitors is its willingness to break backward compatibility.

This is a disadvantage, not a feature. There has never been an instance where I have not wanted backwards compatibility, but there have been many where it was lacking and I did want it.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#6
post #3

"The crucial question about a computer used to be "But can it run DOOM?". Later it became "But can it run Crysis?". These day it is "But can it run nytimes.com?". To which I am happy to report I was able to browse newspaper websites without burning myself." Is there something I am missing with newer laptops? I have a 2008 Thinkpad x200, and I was able to do this just fine.

But did you also use Ublock Origin?

With ads sites can be very CPU intensive.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#7
post #3

"The crucial question about a computer used to be "But can it run DOOM?". Later it became "But can it run Crysis?". These day it is "But can it run nytimes.com?". To which I am happy to report I was able to browse newspaper websites without burning myself." Is there something I am missing with newer laptops? I have a 2008 Thinkpad x200, and I was able to do this just fine.

But did you also use Ublock Origin? With ads sites can be very CPU intensive.

Ohh good point! I usually forget about ublock origin.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#8

> The advantage Apple still holds over its competitors is its willingness to break backward compatibility. This is a disadvantage, not a feature. There has never been an instance where I have not wanted backwards compatibility, but there have been many where it was lacking and I did want it.

This is a false dichotomy, you don't know what was sacrificed for backwards compatibility or what features were crippled because of it.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#9

> The advantage Apple still holds over its competitors is its willingness to break backward compatibility. This is a disadvantage, not a feature. There has never been an instance where I have not wanted backwards compatibility, but there have been many where it was lacking and I did want it.

Yeah I don't get the author's point either. Is having to always buy the latest software/peripheral an advantage? Maybe for Apple, not for the user.

Re: But Can It Run Nytimes.com?

#10

> The advantage Apple still holds over its competitors is its willingness to break backward compatibility. This is a disadvantage, not a feature. There has never been an instance where I have not wanted backwards compatibility, but there have been many where it was lacking and I did want it.

This is a false dichotomy, you don't know what was sacrificed for backwards compatibility or what features were crippled because of it.

That's a lazy way to justify any anti-consumer practice
Post reply on HN