Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually for language learning at least, understanding doesn't need to come before rote memorization. While "stupidly" learning a one-two word definition might not allow you to understand how a word is actually used, it will allow you to get its meaning should you encounter it in native material, delaying understanding to that moment.
Even in science there is a lot of knowledge that doesn't need to be understood. For math subjects that would be all the definitions for example.
Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
221–230 of 249 posts
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't equate UX to a particular era. UX is how a thing works . That is a timeless quality. Anki UX just sucks. I agree. Even if it were year 2000, its UX is not great.
I think they may have meant UI, at least more than UX. The visuals of the interface feel like they're from about a decade ago, and while I don't really mind this on my minimal Linux desktop environment because it's at least clearly laid out, it's a little aesthetically out-of-place on some other systems.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
>somehow mentality of "iOS users are rich" sneaked in This is just not true. The android app is an open source project by the community, whereas the iOS app is made by the original developer of anki.
What about desktop app?
It's "subsidized" by iOS purchases I believe.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#224I use Anki a few times a week. When I've used it for math (as I work my way through Gilbert Strang's book "Linear Algebra and its applications"), I add full problems that seemed to be key to the topic, or surprised me in some way. These take longer to review, but I find it's been really helpful. And once it sticks, I don't have to review it again for months. I also find it can be helpful to have a single card that pr…
But by keeping those things together you're essentially cheating. You won't be able to remember these things in isolation as well. Also if it's easy for you to remember the rank of the matrix, but not the subspaces, you will be asked about the rank too often, since you connected it to subspaces.
I think my more important point was about problem sets, for instance:
Construct a matrix with the required property, or explain why you can't.
- left nullspace contains [1 3]^T
- rowspace contains [3 1]^T
breaks down into a few steps, and trying to break that down into bite sized flashcards such as, "what's the key idea in constructing a matrix with left nullspace [1 3]^T" and "given a matrix that is the product of L with row [1 3] can you choose a U so that combined they form a matrix with row space [3 1]?" seems like it could risk in resulting in me not being able to figure out the entire problem together. But maybe not?
Bringing it back to the post's proof example, what if you had completely nailed every step of the proof such that Anki doesn't ask you about it for a while, and then 6 months later, one of the harder steps comes up in isolation:
"What is the second adjustment we make in the proof of the ratio test, a what if you can't remember the first steps? Would having the rest of the context help? I guess it's a tradeoff.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fun fact: when learning Japanese a decade ago I did 35 new cards a day for 2 years. I hit 400 reviews a day and review sessions were several hours. One day I just stopped and deleted it all.
well, yeah. you shouldn't be doing 35 new cards a day. it's not anki's fault that you had several hours worth of reviews. it's your fault. anki scales to take up as much time as you tell it to. if you had done 5-10 cards a day you could have easily had it take like 20 minutes. also you should have cards set to leech suspend. there is no reason to having certain cards that you clearly aren't going to learn taking up a…
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey Jack, I've always found your Anki guides to be some of the best. I'm curious, are you still using it all these years later?
As someone who is now over a decade into their programming career, today I find more value in doing analytical breakdowns of my various success and mistakes. What were my oversights on a project? How could I have communicated better? What made one particular library a success, etc.? Therefore, after years of Anki, I've stopped adding new cards and doing repetition; instead I now focus on keeping a code diary. I've pu…
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#227I've completed my Bachelor of Computer Science in just 3 months thanks to deliberate practice and memorization techniques (flashcards, Anki). It shows how outdated our education system is and how much better it could be.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#228I've completed my Bachelor of Computer Science in just 3 months thanks to deliberate practice and memorization techniques (flashcards, Anki). It shows how outdated our education system is and how much better it could be.
You should write an article or blog post on how you did it.
Re: Anki as Learning Superpower: Computer Science Edition
#229For those that would rather use an analog method, you can make a Leitner Box of flash cards, which, if you follow the schedule, works in a similar way as Anki. I find that writing the cards out by hand is the first step in memorizing them. See how to use one in this interactive comic: https://ncase.me/remember/
The issue with that is that I'd be at a 5 digit number of cards by now, certainly wouldn't keep all of those around, and so I'd stop revising old knowledge.