Live data from Hacker News

Why Corporate Incubators Fail

dweekly.medium.com

1–7 of 7 posts

Re: Why Corporate Incubators Fail

#2
Hi David! Your work at Hacker Dojo was really inspirational when we were starting BioCurious. Cool to see you've built so much experience on corporate incubators, I'm curious if lessons from Hacker Dojo played a role?

(BioCurious is the world’s first hacker space for biotech, in case anyone is curious. http://BioCurious.org

Re: Why Corporate Incubators Fail

#3
post #2

Hi David! Your work at Hacker Dojo was really inspirational when we were starting BioCurious. Cool to see you've built so much experience on corporate incubators, I'm curious if lessons from Hacker Dojo played a role? (BioCurious is the world’s first hacker space for biotech, in case anyone is curious. http://BioCurious.org

Thank you! I'm so glad for what you've built at BioCurious. Awesome work.

The Dojo is kind of an anarchist startup incubator / hackerspace / community learning space. Our metrics tend to be more about the number of people we serve, membership counts, and membership experience surveys rather than total market cap generated. (Sadly we don't see any of the upside of our successful graduates like Pinterest or Lambda School.)

It does let us see some of what's needed for innovation to happen - and it's surprisingly little. A lot of that is just getting the heck out of the way of very ambitious and curious people and giving them a space to work, connect with each other, have fast and reliable internet, and some basic tooling. Don't forget coffee!

The more rigorous and firmly guided the approach about exactly how to innovate, generally the less innovative the outputs are. Just letting curious people tinker and enquire and hear from others who have actually done it themselves is most of the battle.

It was Mexican.VC as much as anything that confirmed this as well as adding another key ingredient: believing in people. It is tremendously motivating to have someone credible tell you clearly that they think you can come up with something valuable. The Mexican startup ecosystem had not been taken seriously but once they were they performed incredibly well. At Mexican.VC we returned 11x cash on cash to our LPs and before we are done we may nearly double that. It pays to bet on people and markets that aren't getting enough attention!

Re: Why Corporate Incubators Fail

#4
Article was perfect timing for me. The company I work at started one of these and I'm in the middle of trying to grow an idea/product. Great food for thought for long term strategy / positioning if it does go anywhere.

Re: Why Corporate Incubators Fail

#5
This is a well written and interesting article. Large corporations will usually have a checklist with things like: Get the support of top management; Get the necessary resources (budget, people, office space); etc. This article tells you what those things should really mean. It is based on actual experience, not just some academics studying 3M and Apple, good stuff David! - Please feel free to write a similar blog post about Latin American startups, another area where on paper you would expect some big successes, but so far things have been underwhelming.

Re: Why Corporate Incubators Fail

#6
post #5

This is a well written and interesting article. Large corporations will usually have a checklist with things like: Get the support of top management; Get the necessary resources (budget, people, office space); etc. This article tells you what those things should really mean. It is based on actual experience, not just some academics studying 3M and Apple, good stuff David! - Please feel free to write a similar blog po…

Thank you, elantis. I'm glad you enjoyed it.

In terms of LATAM, I think the party's just getting started. Literally earlier _this month_ we saw the formation of the first ever Mexican unicorn as Kavak was valued at over 1$bn. I feel like the potential for both the market and the startups out of LATAM have not been fully appreciated or priced in, so there are many opportunities there. In particular "Series B" / growth financing rounds are unnaturally difficult to raise, so the first Sequoia or the like to double down on the space will likely perform very well over a 10 year fund lifetime.

Many US funds have Limited Partner Agreements that put restrictions on the amount of capital that can be invested in non-US entities. Some clever firms and companies have gotten around this by having LATAM startups create a parent company that is a Delaware C corporation in which investors invest. That has some nice auxiliary benefits like falling under QSBS. But it would be good to have large VCs have funds set up such that they could invest directly in promising LATAM startups.