Live data from Hacker News

YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

github.com

141–150 of 1001 posts

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#141

You can download the most recent version of the YouTube-DL code from Wayback Machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/20201018144703/https://github.co... Fuck the RIAA

I can still install it via pip:

    pip3 install --user --upgrade youtube-dl
So I guess they haven't issued a take down to PyPy yet.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#142
post #4

Note that RIAA is making this takedown because the software CAN be used to download copyrighted music and videos, and it uses examples in the ~~README~~(unit tests, see correction[1]) as an example of that: > We also note that the source code prominently includes as sample uses of the source code the downloading of copies of our members’ copyrighted sound recordings and music videos, as noted in Exhibit A hereto. For…

so should we take down web browsers as well? because they CAN be used to download copyrighted music and videos.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#143
post #105
post #4

Note that RIAA is making this takedown because the software CAN be used to download copyrighted music and videos, and it uses examples in the ~~README~~(unit tests, see correction[1]) as an example of that: > We also note that the source code prominently includes as sample uses of the source code the downloading of copies of our members’ copyrighted sound recordings and music videos, as noted in Exhibit A hereto. For…

The fact that copyrighted works were included in the readme shows it was intended for that use, and the RIAA complaint will likely stand up to any legal scrutiny. Just because it can be used for legit purposes too won't matter in the slightest. I mean, Napster could have been used for legal means as well, and it got destroyed in court. The only chance tools like this have legally is when infringement is an "unintende…

Should it stand up to legal scrutiny though?

What does it matter if I play the beatles on youtube by watching in a web browser or watching an .mp4 file that I just downloaded? It's functionally the same.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#145
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was thinking the same thing: The next step following this line of thinking would be trying to ban all torrent clients, because they CAN be used to download copyrighted material. This is crazy.

Why stop with torrent clients? They should ban all browsers, because they CAN be used to download copyrighted materials!

All computers with the option to install applications or unlocked/unlockable bootloaders can be used to make copies of copyrighted materials. And it certainly happens a lot.

But then, when secure boot came, Microsoft was forced to grant every owner of an Intel compatible computer the right to unlock it for antitrust reasons (luckily).

So were is the borderline between a legal tool and an illegal tool? Well, lawyers will find out...

In the meantime youtube-dl needs to be distributed some other channel. Which of course might raise the risk of back-doored or otherwise poisoned version floating around.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#147
post #12

They should have counter claimed this nonsense instead of taking down the repo. RIAA is an abusive troll.

It sounds like the RIAA is comfortable filing DMCA takedowns when the logic is questionable.

If so, then I'm curious about the legality of a counter-attack: Look at any websites, photos, music, videos, and text presented online by everyone represented by the RIAA. If anyone in a competent jurisdiction sees any similarity to prior art that they've created, even if it's their 2nd grade writing assignment, hit them with a DMCA takedown notice.

After all, we just need a good-faith belief that it might fly in some court somewhere, right?

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Github is obligated to take down the "offending" content as soon as they receive a DMCA notice. It's then on the owner of that content to file a counter claim to restore it. Even if the content is not in violation of DMCA, your files will be gone for a day or two, or longer depending on how slow the publishing platform operators are to process the counter claim and how long it takes to file the counter claim.

Has anyone tried sending automated DMCA for the entirety of Github? Once half of github is under bogus DMCA, maybe that'll make them think for a minute. I'm halfway serious.

You as a random person would be committing what's essentially (or actually?) perjury and I'd expect you'd either be ignored or prosecuted. Big companies seem to get freebies on this, doubt you would.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#149
post #99

> this seems outrageous the same way DMCA'ing a Bittorrent client would be Why stop there? I can use my browser to illegally download content, so I guess we better issue a DMCA takedown that too. But who even needs a browser? Let's issue a takedown for the GNU Project while we're at it because I could use wget to do the same thing. In fact, I could write my own program to illegally download content, so we better just…

cURL could be used to download pornography. Think of the children!

No wait lets go one more layer down. Lets attack the net and socket c/c++ libraries as they can also be used to download a little bit of pron.

Re: YouTube-dl has received a DMCA takedown from RIAA

#150

You can download the most recent version of the YouTube-DL code from Wayback Machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/20201018144703/https://github.co... Fuck the RIAA

youtube-dl is in every linux repo, so the source code is widely mirrored and is not going anywhere.
Post reply on HN