Live data from Hacker News

Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

collaborativefund.com

1–10 of 30 posts

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#3
Isn’t this related to Pareto Distributions?

Once you lose, you generally have lost some resources or access to resources, so now you have less resources. Having less resources, you are less likely to be able to take some resources and try to win again?

Winning means you have more resources or greater access to resources, meaning you can try again.

The unfortunate part is in the losing cycle, you can get stuck at zero... you lost and hit zero... now you have no resources and no way to get out of your situation.

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#5
The obvious thing to say is "climate"

But I guess that would be seen as 'inflammatory' -when in fact it goes to exactly the same disjoin between statistics, and experiental sense. Nobody who doubts in AGW thinks the changes represent systemic, across the board, movement in time. They just think "its always been this variable" and miss the year on year accumulating effect.

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#6
post #2

Thought this had to do with their recent controversy..

For the ignorant, what was that?

The CEO of CircleUp stepped down and published an email he sent to a former board member accusing said board member of poor/damaging behavior. The board member is suspected to be from Collaborative Fund: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24793170

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#7
This really is a good thing to keep in mind when it seems like the bad news keeps coming every day-- whether it be on the global/national stage, in your business or in your personal life. Overall, things in general are still slowly getting better for everyone on average.

Of course, knowing this doesn't help much when you're facing catastrophe that damages your own well being, and past performance is an unreliable predictor of future results. It's even possible we could see a reversal of many (or all) of these generally progressive trends if there is an unprecedented, massive collapse in the global economy.

But when the noise in your head of 'all the terrible things happening' is getting too loud, it can ease the stress a bit to remember that the trend is still upward in a lot of really amazing ways. When the chips are down, there's always tomorrow, and your odds of bouncing back better than before usually aren't as poor as it feels like in those moments of loss. And while it may not work for everyone, I personally take some comfort when I'm down thinking about all those out there who've been working a long time for a big win and finally got one today.

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#8
Wasn't this the unprofessional fund on the board of CircleUp that tormented the founder so much that he wrote a long critique? (but not this VC partner specifically)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17tEc9ETL4tjfTmNbpwJJ5OSx...

If so, I'm not sure I want to be listening to advice from them...

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#9

Wasn't this the unprofessional fund on the board of CircleUp that tormented the founder so much that he wrote a long critique? (but not this VC partner specifically) https://docs.google.com/document/d/17tEc9ETL4tjfTmNbpwJJ5OSx... If so, I'm not sure I want to be listening to advice from them...

Agreed, my opinion of them (which admittedly doesn't matter) dropped dramatically after reading some of the alleged behavior of the partner.

Re: Lots of overnight tragedies, no overnight miracles

#10
post #5

The obvious thing to say is "climate" But I guess that would be seen as 'inflammatory' -when in fact it goes to exactly the same disjoin between statistics, and experiental sense. Nobody who doubts in AGW thinks the changes represent systemic, across the board, movement in time. They just think "its always been this variable" and miss the year on year accumulating effect.

"Watch Out for that Glacier!" -- Blake Snyder crystallized the difficulty in getting an audience to care about danger that is approaching too slowly.
Post reply on HN