Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your argument is the worst possible faith argument but I'll bite and let you waste some of my time with your non scientific citations. Now here's how misguided you are: Literally from the first article you posted: (which was a fricking opinion piece!) “"""If you look at any one paper — it’s not a slam dunk. But, taken all together, I’m convinced that they are working,” says Grabowski."""" "It's not a slam dunk" Anecd…
The second link I posted was co-authored by the director of the CDC. The others are reviews of current evidence that are readable and reputable. There are abundant studies on this subject. Here is what the WHO actually has to say about masks ( https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2... ): > “ Masks are a key measure to suppress transmission and save lives. Masks reduce potential exposure risk fro…
If there are abundant studies on the subject why can't you produce ONE actual SCIENTIFIC PAPER?
P.R. webpages, opinion pieces, anecdotal evidence from random "experts", are not science!
You would fail my high school science class with the weak citations you've produced so far.
Because you can't. Because you're wrong.
Yet you sit there in your smug arrogance patting yourself on the back for giving it to the 'dermb anti-merskers'..... All the while we have more deaths per capita than Sweden and Norway both who had no mask mandates and who haven't had significant numbers of corona deaths in months. Meanwhile 75% or more of Americans support mask usage and we're entering a third wave of Coronavirus.
Might be useful to re-evaluate who is spreading the disinformation about putting plague vectors directly onto their respiratory tracts and killing people.
Thalidomide was supported by a ton of health experts too until the flipper children started showing up. Oh and that oopsie Tuskegee study! Other than that though!