Live data from Hacker News

Krita 4.4.0

krita.org

101–110 of 143 posts

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not everyone wants to use the Windows Store, for multiple reasons. There's no reason to scare users away from independent software distribution.

Have you never had a relative (usually your mom) install malware because they didn't know any better? Most people are not so tech savvy as those of us who frequent Hacker News.

But the message specifically says MS will only trust applications signed by a Digitcert certificate. The problem isn't that they're doing the check, it's that the check is poor. There's no reason it needs to prevent people from installing software that has been signed.

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#102
post #13

In this increasingly "Software as a Service" world, it's nice to have a good alternative where you actually own the software you are using. Being FOSS is just icing on the cake. Huge respect to the team behind Krita, and the KDE community as a whole.

While I share your appreciation of Krita and FOSS in general (long live Gimp and Inkscape), I have to point out that there are good commercial software that are not a total subscription rip-off (I'm looking at you Adobe). Here are some I know of and have used (bugs and limitations and everything): - The Affinity suite - Corel Painter and perhaps a few others. They do their job of paying their developers, cultivating…

I also love Acorn on the Mac. It’s not as advanced as Photoshop, but I can do my layers, “curves”, selections, masks, etc. And I find the UI easier to manage than GIMP. I think it’s about $30 and you have to pay for major upgrades. I’ve paid twice I think in maybe 5 or 10 years.

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#103
post #13

In this increasingly "Software as a Service" world, it's nice to have a good alternative where you actually own the software you are using. Being FOSS is just icing on the cake. Huge respect to the team behind Krita, and the KDE community as a whole.

While I share your appreciation of Krita and FOSS in general (long live Gimp and Inkscape), I have to point out that there are good commercial software that are not a total subscription rip-off (I'm looking at you Adobe). Here are some I know of and have used (bugs and limitations and everything): - The Affinity suite - Corel Painter and perhaps a few others. They do their job of paying their developers, cultivating…

I got Corel Painter 2020 for $30 through a Humble Bundle. It's quite enjoyable to use!

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#104

Is Krita good for vector art? I often use InkScape to touch up or modify icons, but have found InkScape's UI to sometimes completely bug out. (besides looking generally bad). Is Krita an alternative to InkScape?

It's a raster painting application, so it's not comparable to Inkscape.

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#105
post #86
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s not accurate. Gatekeeper only warns about unsigned software. It has nothing to do with whether it is in the App Store or not.

That's not accurate. The options in System Preferences are: Allow apps downloaded from: ○ App Store ○ App Store and identified developers There used to be a third option, ○ Anywhere but the frog is warmer now.

Your options list supports my assertion:

Identified developers = signed

FYI: frogs actually do jump out of water as it gets hotter.

You may be right that this changes in the future, but for now I am correct.

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#106

a bit off topic, but know any easy to use vector art program for kids? Really looking for something my kids can get into! Krita supports vector layers, but it's for simple shapes/text overlays

Inkscape?

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#107
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I trust my capability to moderate the sites I download from more than I trust Microsoft to prevent malware on the store. So you are implying that your personal capabilities reflect the majority of users out there? That's a bold assumption! The Windows Store is meant for a general audience, and the general audience are users that ended up with 10 rows of custom "toolbars" in their browser after a few days of using t…

> The Windows Store is meant for a general audience, and the general audience are users that ended up with 10 rows of custom "toolbars" in their browser after a few days of using the internet. Maybe at one point, but at this point the general audience A) Just does everything in the browser. B) Knows enough to do things right C) Does not yet know enough to do things right, will screw up an install, and learn from expe…

> Maybe at one point, but at this point the general audience > B) Knows enough to do things right

Reality check: https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/34822/the-state-of-ransomware-i...

Note that not all these incidents resulted from drive-by-downloads or elaborate hacks:

> Riviera Beach: In June, Riviera Beach, Florida, was hit with ransomware when a police department employee opened a malicious email attachment.

In 2019, people still click every e-mail attachment unchecked, even though e-mail attachments have been a primary vector for attacks for decades at this point.

Putting faith in the abilities of the average user is the first step towards disaster. The average user is not more aware or capable in 2020 than they were in 1995. People still carelessly put random USB drives into their machines, still open dodgy e-mail attachments and still download and execute installers and other executables from random websites.

Some sobering stats for mobile [1]:

> Less than 20% of mobile malware is delivered via a browser — the remainder of the payloads come through an app. (Source: RSA Current State of Cybercrime)

Last but unfortunately not least, unpatched systems are still presenting a completely avoidable attack vector for malware and ransomware, because users (both private and industrial/institutional) fail to update their systems [2].

So no, the harsh reality is that the average user is neither aware, nor capable of "doing things right".

[1] https://phoenixnap.com/blog/ransomware-statistics-facts

[2] https://www.mcafee.com/enterprise/en-us/assets/reports/rp-qu...

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#108
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like perhaps Mac or Windows would be a better fit for you.

In fact, I think Linux's package management is too inflexible. You always need to wait for maintainer to package it for you, and it is not as fast as upstream. To have multiple version of a same package usually require to compile yourself, use a PPA or download a package and install it. Compiling a software not always easy, and it takes times. The PPA and install a random package from Internet isn't really securer th…

Linux has the advantage of many choices so you can use what fits you best.

If your hardware has good Linux drivers and if the software you need has a Linux version then IMO you can find a distribution that will match your needs. Arch could be great for some people but an LTS will be more popular with other people. For example in my case I use Intellij for work and it comes in a tar.gz file format that I can use and I can keep the old version around when updating. The only time I compiled things was when I modified stuff to add my own changes to open source software.

If you are gaming I think you should still use Windows or a console, even some will claim Proton works with most games the experience can be frustrating with many of the games that are claimed to work.

Re: Krita 4.4.0

#109
post #82
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's fair, but completely besides the point of the OP. If the complaint is "because it doesn't work well enough", the proper solution is to just disable it, which is of course an option. Crying "foul!", however, is neither constructive nor helpful in way.

> If the complaint is "because it doesn't work well enough", the proper solution is to just disable it, which is of course an option. Crying "foul!", however, is neither constructive nor helpful in way. Are you sure you meant exactly what you wrote? I mean: The correct thing to do if you have a smoke detector that gives false positives isn't to throw out smoke detectors but to complain to the place that sold it and g…

I am sure I mean what I wrote. If someone thinks SmartScreen isn't a good solution, they should disable it. Using a different solution is independent of that.

To use your smoke detector analogy: if a smoke detector goes off twice a day and once in the middle of the night every other night, you sure as heck DO throw it out. If only because every false alarm desensitises you to actual alarms and makes your default reaction to just remove the batteries of that thing.

The real issue is that the false alarms don't necessarily come from a faulty detector, but are due to the fact that someone keeps smoking in the house or keeps burning their food all the time and then keeps telling everyone that smoking doesn't affect them negatively, because they only smoke one cigarette every other day so smoking is actually safe for everyone and that the detector is to blame for all the false alarms.

Post reply on HN