Live data from Hacker News

2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

vice.com

161–170 of 320 posts

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#161

Folks, I am the guy behind this project. A friend of mine mentioned he saw the site mentioned on hacker news, so I came to check it out. If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask, as time permits (and two little boys), I'll do my best to answer them.

Nice work my friend. As many demo-scene groups were active on newsgroups before going very dark almost 30 years ago I'm curious if you also have a collection that you can contribute to this basic collection https://archive.org/details/scenenotices . There's lots of this stuff going on throughout the decades but you may be in a position to help preserve history / lineage on the entire environment.

I won't have much when it comes to binaries, I am text mostly, but in terms of text I should have things going that far back.

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#163

Would it be fair to say that Reddit is the modern UseNet?

yes

Welcome to HN! I'm sorry that you were getting rate limited and have turned that off now (I'm a mod here). Our software does that because of past abuses by trolls, and the fact that it also affects users who show up here to discuss their work is the thing I hate most about our entire system.

Please comment as much as you like—and thanks for working on rectifying the lost-Usenet issue.

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#164

Folks, I am the guy behind this project. A friend of mine mentioned he saw the site mentioned on hacker news, so I came to check it out. If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask, as time permits (and two little boys), I'll do my best to answer them.

I just want to say thank you to you and everyone involved! I ran a little mini project a while ago to archive my old Usenet posts by using puppeteer to scrape the content from Google groups, knowing full well that they could shut it down by fiat any time. I've frankly never trusted them as a steward for this and I'm glad to see someone stepping in. Do you have any plans to team up with the Internet Archive on this?

Once I have everything in DB format, I'll certainly attempt to post it there.

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#165

Folks, I am the guy behind this project. A friend of mine mentioned he saw the site mentioned on hacker news, so I came to check it out. If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask, as time permits (and two little boys), I'll do my best to answer them.

I'm getting this: Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function real_escape_string() on null in /var/www/html/usenetarchives.com/3.vars.php:80 Stack trace: #0 /var/www/html/usenetarchives.com/1.header.php(190): include() #1 /var/www/html/usenetarchives.com/view.php(22): include_once('/var/www/html/u...') #2 {main} thrown in /var/www/html/usenetarchives.com/3.vars.php on line 80 Pretty consistently.

on which pages, please share some examples... I was doing some changes there, let me know...

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#166

Folks, I am the guy behind this project. A friend of mine mentioned he saw the site mentioned on hacker news, so I came to check it out. If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask, as time permits (and two little boys), I'll do my best to answer them.

Why are many words censored? To take a completely random example (I just took one with many asterisks) where it makes the post completely illegible: https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=soc.sexuality.gen... For an archive this is a big no-no. Respect the source material! Otherwise, thank you for the time spent doing this.

Not a perfect filter:

> On Oct 13, 11:36 am, "Colin" wrote:

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#167

Folks, I am the guy behind this project. A friend of mine mentioned he saw the site mentioned on hacker news, so I came to check it out. If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask, as time permits (and two little boys), I'll do my best to answer them.

Agree with throwaway89201. Don't do that. Reproduce the text as you found it.

Re: 2.1M of the oldest Usenet posts are now online for anyone to read

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are many words censored? To take a completely random example (I just took one with many asterisks) where it makes the post completely illegible: https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=soc.sexuality.gen... For an archive this is a big no-no. Respect the source material! Otherwise, thank you for the time spent doing this.

For future historians, the post is about the sex act known as the “dirty sanchez”.

This is not what I expected to learn today on HN
Post reply on HN