Earlier quoted context omitted.
> what a minimum wage actually does is remove the possibility for anyone to work below an arbitrary number of dollars. It should be paired with a federal jobs guarantee and universal healthcare then.
I think to work right the jobs guarantee needs to be a temporary guarantee with the aim of upskilling and not purely a "make work" program. Something more like college, though not academic, with built-in accountability mechanisms. It shouldn't be normalized to be a "lifelong" thing, in the same way we think it's unusual for someone to be a lifelong college student. At least one without milestones such as degrees, etc…
If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
441–450 of 451 posts
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quantity of regulations is not the same as regulatory burden, and it's not like every single businness in the whole country needs to keep track of every single one. In the food service industry, the most common type of small business, there are only 2400 federal regulations, and most of them concern common sense things, like "wipe tables after customers use them" and "cook chicken to 180°" and "don't let rats live un…
> it's not like every single businness [sic] in the whole country needs to keep track of every single one. That's an incorrect understanding of how laws and regulations work. Ignorantia juris non excusat . > 2400 seems like a laughably small number of regulations. I'd love to hear a food service operator's perspective. It may differ from yours.
I worked in the restaurant business, I know how thoelse regulations work. Not every one applies to every business. We didn't serve eggs, so we didn't need to Cara about all of the special rules for cooking eggs to temperature, maintaining separate tools and workstations, refrigerator temperatures, etc just for eggs. 5he same is true of all the other thousands of ingredients and food items we did not serve.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#443Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it's not like every single businness [sic] in the whole country needs to keep track of every single one. That's an incorrect understanding of how laws and regulations work. Ignorantia juris non excusat . > 2400 seems like a laughably small number of regulations. I'd love to hear a food service operator's perspective. It may differ from yours.
Please explain to me why a restaraunteur needs to know about the proper temperature for casting steam locomotive crank arms, or how many people need to be in a coal plant's fire response station. Under what circumstances will a food truck operator need to know those? I worked in the restaurant business, I know how thoelse regulations work. Not every one applies to every business. We didn't serve eggs, so we didn't ne…
One might have one agency in charge of one thing and another one in charge of another, with no rhyme or reason to it. There is no way to find out all the regulations that apply to your specific business unless you 1) consult a very expensive lawyer or 2) read an authoritative, current reference specific to your field of endeavor. 2) is usually not an option if you're doing something uncommon or brand new.
In the end one's best bet as a business owner is consulting an experienced lawyer for everything that you do. They're usually pricy and charge down to the minute. Everything you don't check, is a potential compliance risk. Today some classes of severe violations, for example improperly withholding employee taxes, can even result in the corporate veil being pierced where you as the business owner now become personally liable for your business. And I'm not even getting into things like tech that have no legal certainty whatsoever.
All these legal and compliance costs are deadweight on the economy, they could have been used to invest in better equipment or to pay employees more, instead they are spent on lawyers. Some laws & regs are no doubt necessary, but anything beyond that is a net loss for everyone. The balance always seems to only land one way these days.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#444Minimum wage is bad for workers. Increasing minimum wage hurts low-skilled workers even more. Which is a cruel thing to do, especially for a programmer who earns significantly more and is not affected by minimum wage.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#445National minimum wage is stupid. Even state minimum wage is a bit silly. There is way too much variance from one location to another. MIT created a “living wage” calculator that tries to estimate what the minimum livable wage should be in a given city.[0] Some extreme variance from state to state and city to city. There is no reason to do this federally. States and cities should handle minimum wage. [0]: https://livi…
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#446National minimum wage is stupid. Even state minimum wage is a bit silly. There is way too much variance from one location to another. MIT created a “living wage” calculator that tries to estimate what the minimum livable wage should be in a given city.[0] Some extreme variance from state to state and city to city. There is no reason to do this federally. States and cities should handle minimum wage. [0]: https://livi…
Why shouldn't the federal government implement the min. wage as min(cities & states) so that any bad actors of states & cities that don't follow the "living wage" calculator are accounted for? Isn't this what the federal government currently tries to do?
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why shouldn't the federal government implement the min. wage as min(cities & states) so that any bad actors of states & cities that don't follow the "living wage" calculator are accounted for? Isn't this what the federal government currently tries to do?
It’s not the business of the federal government to dictate to each state what their minimum wage should be. States are free to make their own decisions on minimum wage. Citizens within those states can vote to change it, and if they don’t like it, they can leave to another state.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
What separates the haves from the have-nots? It's not blogs.
In America it's largely the choices people make. After all, school doesn't teach how to create a startup. But there are plenty of books and blogs on how to do it. All one needs is the get-up-and-go to take advantage of all the freely available information.
There's also an implication that it's simply okay to let job security rot away, that people in precarious work should simply read a few blogs and retrain. I'm not convinced that it's a good plan to ignore creepingly pervasive employment insecurity.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#449Earlier quoted context omitted.
SWE's don't have a union, so of course they're getting relatively hosed, too. Though the disparity is somewhat justified in that the efficiency of software (neither in its running nor production) haw kept up with Moore's Law. In any case, owners and executives are funneling up the excess value created. It's there, you're just not getting it.
> they're getting relatively hosed If by "hosed" you mean getting $120K salary right out of school, then I guess that's true. I'm just not sure I'd call that "getting hosed" though. If you want to see what "getting hosed" means, go work as an SWE in Europe.
Re: If pay had kept pace with productivity gains, minimum wage would be $24 an hour
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not fair at all. The responsibilities of retail employees have grown vastly in the last 50 years. There's more product, with a greater diversity of handling requirements, which need to be stocked across larger stores later in the day (as closing times slowly approach midnight or later). That's for supermarkets (which are increasingly part of larger big box stores). If you work checkout at a place that sells anyt…
Your are comparing one industry and one job in that industry and it is still a bad comparison. The idea that working a cash register now takes more skill than before is false. The idea that you have to now have more knowledge is false. People were not stupid back then and supermarkets still existed, and neither then nor now does a minimum wage employee need vast amounts of knowledge. The best retail employee has a po…
And cashiers still have to do math. Most places don't have automatic change dispensers, nor can a machinr account for a customer suddenly switching which bills they're going to give you. I understand that never having had to work one of those jobs is a source of pride in a lot of places, but in this thread, it just outs you as ignorant.