Live data from Hacker News

When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

twitter.com

181–190 of 243 posts

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#181
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Pissed" meaning inebriated and not angry.

Had a colleague at one job who was from London and he was describing the steps he had taken to fix his car. I had to tell him he lost me at bonnet. Two countries sharing words.

“[…]divided by a common language”. (Commonly attributed to George Bernard Shaw.)

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#182
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I put my phone in airplane mode at night. Don't a lot of people do that? What are they thinking?

Don’t iPhones put themselves into do not disturb mode at night? I hope the Nobel folks call twice in 3 minutes!

Those are optional settings.

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#183

This really makes me wonder - what if you win a Nobel prize and they actually can't reach you? What if you're on a secret mission to save the world and didn't bring your cellphone?

They announce it anyway and you get to find out from the press or people calling you. It's happened before.

When the Mosers won the prize, Edvard was flying. Needless to say, when he turned his phone on, it overflowed with text messages.

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#184
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Berkeley gives you a parking space if you work there and win a Nobel. The rich get richer. I remember filling out school and early job applications. I was struck by how my list of awards and recognitions was kind of a sham—most of them were each a consequence of some earlier achievement, and so on. It felt like getting a check and being able to cash it more than once.

> I was struck by how my list of awards and recognitions was kind of a sham—most of them were each a consequence of some earlier achievement, and so on. Achievement and power are runaway positive feedback loops which means we need damping forces to have any reasonable level of fairness where "fair" means reward is proportional to the effort.

Scientific achievement is the actual value of science, not getting a prize. We certainly don't need any kind of damping forces to make scientists rewarded for their effort if that in any way impedes the most successful from pushing the boundaries forward. I think you're putting the cart before the horse in prioritizing fairness and personal awards over humanity-improving results.

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe not the best example.

Yeah at least for Watson!! Ew.

It's possible that nature doesn't conform to your particular culture's ideology. Science hasn't actually shown him to be wrong.

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#186
post #169
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is hundreds of millions of dollars that are being spent for an activity that is a tax on investors. The fact that it is better than what existed before doesn't change the fact that we can do better yet.

In general, HFT charges a lot less tax than the market makers of old. And for retail investors, HFT helps them a lot .

How do HFT help retail investors? While I understand that HFT are not technically front running, it seems to me (as someone who is not that involved with finance) that functionally it's more or less the same outcome?

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#187
post #169
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is hundreds of millions of dollars that are being spent for an activity that is a tax on investors. The fact that it is better than what existed before doesn't change the fact that we can do better yet.

In general, HFT charges a lot less tax than the market makers of old. And for retail investors, HFT helps them a lot .

What part of The fact that it is better than what existed before doesn't change the fact that we can do better yet. did you fail to understand?

Yes, HFT manages to do better than the old market makers that had humans doing the same job that HFT does now in the same way with bigger margins. But that doesn't change the fact that for retail investors, I believe that my suggestion in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24760841 would help them even more.

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#188
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You were on the previous level and didn't stumble or make a complete mess, so it makes sense to invite you to the next one. See Peter Principle.

I have generally resisted further advancement, well aware of my level of competence. Also, the next level up is often not a level where the required skills are the same. Right now, I do stuff. At the next level up, I'd be required to do some stuff, but mostly coordinate other people's stuff, which is a very different skill set.

I regret bringing up the peter principle. I didn't mean to say anything except that you probably earned what you have more than you think :)

Re: When You Win a Nobel and They Can't Reach You at Home

#190
post #186
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In general, HFT charges a lot less tax than the market makers of old. And for retail investors, HFT helps them a lot .

How do HFT help retail investors? While I understand that HFT are not technically front running, it seems to me (as someone who is not that involved with finance) that functionally it's more or less the same outcome?

Smaller spreads. Plus I imagine that most retail investors don't make orders large enough that they need to be fulfilled at multiple exchanges, so HFT won't have the chance to get in front of retail.
Post reply on HN