Live data from Hacker News

The next US president won’t be great for H-1B visas

qz.com

91–93 of 93 posts

Re: The next US president won’t be great for H-1B visas

#91

Auction, auction, auction - but not with fees, with salaries. Set a cap on number of entrants, and then "auction" the slots. Adjust the cap on entrants annually. No showing of specific market need required, or educational background of the applicant. Just criminal background and health checks on the applicant. The bid is the (gross) pay of the role with a minimum commit of 36 months. Winning bids are paid to the empl…

So perhaps I own a factory or two in the Republic of Elsewhere. I think it prudent to get one of my kids over to the USA. I call up a tech company in the US and make the following offer: you hire my kid, I'll pay the salary and enough over that to hire somebody to do that job, and a generous sweetener above that.

In practice, I suppose somebody with that kind of money has other options. Still the proposal seems open to abuse.

Re: The next US president won’t be great for H-1B visas

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So only visa for FAANG and finance? Who is going to work outside of New York and Silicon Valley? Who is going to work at the universities?

You can always segment by job category.

I know. And by local median income, and by national interest, and by ....

My point is that the ‘simply auction it off’ approach is bad.

[edit: typo]

Re: The next US president won’t be great for H-1B visas

#93
post #48

How is wage-based visa allocation denying entry-level applicant visas a bad thing? If there are entry level roles to be filled they should be filled locally since they're low skill/experience by definition. If you're going to develop talent you should develop local talent. The deal is that you give foreigners the opportunity because they offer valuable skills.

It is not just entry level roles. H1B also fills universities, nurses, doctors, young startups. They are not going to compete with $400k salaries at FAANG

Clearly wage discriminants needs to be within job types otherwise they're meaningless. I'm sure any honest implementation would be on that basis.
Post reply on HN