Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
1–10 of 107 posts
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#2It's fine to market DDG as privacy respecting, but making an astroturf "privacy advice" org is disgusting.
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#3Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#4Does the misleading "spreadprivacy" domain name really do more good than harm? It's fine to market DDG as privacy respecting, but making an astroturf "privacy advice" org is disgusting.
Why?
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#5Does the misleading "spreadprivacy" domain name really do more good than harm? It's fine to market DDG as privacy respecting, but making an astroturf "privacy advice" org is disgusting.
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#6Does the misleading "spreadprivacy" domain name really do more good than harm? It's fine to market DDG as privacy respecting, but making an astroturf "privacy advice" org is disgusting.
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#7Sure, it's less un-private than using the data vacuum that is Google, but it's still sharing pieces of your life with a random org.
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#8The article doesn't say, but if it used an OpenStreetMap-based routing engine (which you can self-host because, y'know, open data) then the directions might misalign to the display layer which is Apple Maps. Therefore it must send your directions request to Apple. Which I guess is fine, they'll just see "some DDG user" requesting certain directions and it's definitely not the worst company they could be working with,…
Re: Plan Your Route Privately: DuckDuckGo Now Has Driving and Walking Directions
#9Does the misleading "spreadprivacy" domain name really do more good than harm? It's fine to market DDG as privacy respecting, but making an astroturf "privacy advice" org is disgusting.
It clearly says "DuckDuckGo Blog" in the page, so your accusation that it's deliberately causing confusion is just plain false.
Edit: Didn't notice that the sticky header once you scroll down does say "DuckDuckGo Blog". Not sure why it can't just say that in the actual header; intentionally vague or baffling design?