Live data from Hacker News

Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

blog.twitter.com

261–270 of 371 posts

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#261
post #220
post #47

I'm fascinated by the comments here, which seem to be assuming that Twitter is operating in an environment in which the predominate source of trending information is well-meaning individuals and not motivated state-level actors intent on disrupting an election.

I'm curious, have you lived outside of a 100k US city in the last 10 years?

How is that relevant?

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Do you think social networks would be less toxic and less abused if all the devs at Facebook or Twitter were apolitical? It isn't possible to be completely "apolitical" but you can be non-partisan. For me this isn't a left vs right or Republican vs Democrat issue, its an establishment vs everyone else issue. If this policy was in effect in 2002 and 2003 people would be getting censored and banned for disputing "the…

> people would be getting censored and banned for disputing "the fact" that Iraq had WMD Literally nobody was buying that Iraq had WMD. It was clear that the politicians were riling themselves up in a patriotic furvor. The evidence was weak from day one and it was clear a propaganda machine was in play. > Twitter doesn't have a monopoly on the truth, I am so sick of statements like this that ultimately lead to inacti…

That last sentence doesn't apply very often in the real world. We're not talking about philosophically pure truth in most cases, we're talking about things like headlines, in which the same factual event can be spun in innumerable ways, all of which are superficially true.

Bullshit isn't always, or even mostly, an outright lie. I'd go so far as to say that making shit up whole cloth is the rarest kind of deception.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, thanks, this seems to work for now.

You are right to say "for now" - the app will periodically force you back to "Home" view (after a seemingly random period) and then you have to manually switch back - I'm guessing Home view has better "engagement" metrics for the Twitter suits.

If you keep forcing it back to Latest eventually it gets the hint and permanently leaves it there.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#264

Reading these headlines is like living in a dystopian waking nightmare. This is not remotely at all the role that Twitter or any other Silicon Valley tech company should play in society.

>Twitter plays a critical role...facilitating meaningful political debate" Has Twitter actually read Twitter?

There’s a reason “Twitter twat” is a rapidly growing part of the political vernacular.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#265
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> >Second, we will prevent “liked by” and “followed by” recommendations from people you don’t follow from showing up in your timeline and won’t send notifications for these Tweets. I don't know if a Twitter PM will read this, but showing Likes in my feed — and not having an option to turn it off in the official mobile app client — is one big reason I stopped consuming tweets. It's a shame that the only way to opt out…

Try adding some of these to your account-wide “Muted words” list: suggest_recap suggest_who_to_follow suggest_activity suggest_activity_tweet suggest_recycled_tweet_inline suggest_recycled_tweet suggest_grouped_tweet_hashtag suggest_sc_tweet suggest_pyle_tweet suggest_ranked_timeline_tweet suggest_ranked_organic_tweet generic_activity_highlights generic_activity_momentsbreaking ActivityTweet RankedOrganicTweet

Any remedy for "Follow Topic" spam from Twitter? It is so frustrating to have a company ruin a product you were previously so happy with.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#266
post #213

Sounding more and more like a moral panic. Can people in the big cities not accept people in rural areas reject everything they think is good? It's not a foreign plot, it's a fundamental disagreement about values.

A bit of both. Basic propaganda tactic is to emphasize differences and make them appear unbridgeable.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#267

From the top: From Facebook's point of view, we have recently learned that the whole circus around Cambridge Analytica was a gigantic farce and that they had no more access to anything than anyone else - and that they hardly did anything with it to begin with. 2016 taught us that even if everyone puts their chips on one candidate, and says that they have a 99% chance of winning, it may not be a reflection of reality…

I think your point is valid but a condescending tone will probably stop it from being seriously considered.

I don’t think he has anything resembling a good point, and I’m also put off by his tone.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#269
I'm not exaggerating when I say that I truly beleve if Twitter shut down for a few weeks, the world would be a better place. Twitter's influence on world events has been a net negative because of their refusal to apply rules evenly across their users and willingness to turn a blind eye to blatant manipulation by government entities and others filling their site with propaganda.

Re: Additional steps we're taking ahead of the 2020 US Election

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the situation in the USA is quite unique. UK and Australia is not (as of yet) in any serious risk of their democracy being undermined in the next election. Sure you can say they could have had similar measures before the Kyrgyzstan or the Belarus elections. But there bad actors were perfectly able to undermine the democracy without the aid of social media.

Taking all the necessary steps so that one exact candidate (Trump) won't win the next election is "undermining democracy" already, especially as those steps now come from both business (Twitter, FB) and the media (Washington Post, NYTimes). Maybe the Democrats and the people who are called "liberals" don't realise it just yet, but they've lost the game because they've started playing Trump's game. Like I said, they m…

If fact-checking the election results biases against one candidate and not the other, I suggest the issue is the behavior of the candidates, not Twitter.
Post reply on HN