Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s way worse than that. Even centrists and liberals are silenced by the vocal mob for merely questioning the validity of certain policies or initiatives that claim to have some righteous sounding goal, even when there is evidence that the proposed policy is more likely to be harmful than helpful. For example, it should not be controversial to debate the merits of Black Lives Matter, but since the alternate reality…
I always find it curious that some people find BLM as something by which the merits of are debatable. What’s there to debate?
Do you assume that anyone who criticises The People's Democratic Republic of Korea hates democracy and Koreans?