Ok, maybe I'll be the loan dissenter - and a torn one at that. I really think this is a great article and I think this is information that
should certainly be shared out...
I have one nitpick with what the author states that bothers me greatly.
Bare with this statement - I am not against what he did, but this is the biggest worry in hiring any outside dev to do any work for you, and thus has a clear and real issue for the market and industry overall:
The only thing that I feel is a little weird is that we have a developer who says he saw a bunch of requests for an application that does X.
he then turns and build the application to do X himself.
This in and of itself is fine -- but it will certainly wind up pissing people off/alienating people entirely.
The point is that the valley mantra is "ideas are worthless, only execution matters* -- then it makes all devs look like they are just sitting around waiting to leach off others ideas and execute on them themselves for personal profit.
I don't think there is a clear win-win situation here, I just want to point out that the way this article is written, it seems to prove out the worry of the non-dev side of the world == "What is the risk of trying to recruit a developer for my idea, then they just turn and build it for them selves?" (MZ Comes to mind)
This means that ideas ARE NOT worthless, they do have value. Surely, only if you can manage to execute on them - but if the ideas were so worthless in-and-of themselves why arent the millions of developers constantly outdoing themselves with utterly amazing works. They aren't. It takes a great idea AND great execution to matter.