Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you had an argument you would present it, but of course we both know you have nothing. I’ve already presented some of my arguments. But of course we both know that you are being intellectually dishonest. > What's really going on here is that have nothing to say because logic has utterly defeated any capacity for you to deliver a counter argument. You cannot say anything because you know you are completely and ut…
>But sure, I will engage with you on your childish level. See, personal insults. That's why my post went on an expose to get you to say something substantial. Now you engage me because your pride is hurt. >Ironic, isn’t it? Who’s being smug and emotional now? I'm not being being emotional. Just triggering you to get you to respond. Also why does age matter here. It's irrelevant to me that you are clearly under the ag…
Mm-hm. Like I said, I’ll talk to you on your level. I asked your age out of curiosity. I already judge you, so don’t worry about that.
> Thus not even "intelligence" and "existence" are categories that go side by side... let alone "morality."
All you’re saying is that these are abstractions. Do abstractions exist? That’s a philosophical question about what it means to exist.
> You can define a word "gloop" to encompass literal feces and science and logic. Therefore the concept of "gloop" which includes feces is more fundamental than science because it literally encompasses the scientific perspective.
I mean, yes? If you define gloop that way, then obviously it is at least as fundamental as science is. Good luck finding others who are as interested as you are in feces and science.
> Also I never accused others of playing "word games" I am saying people are ignorant and are participating in a word game without even knowing it.
More hypocrisy. People are apparently “participating” in a word game but not “playing” said word game. Yet you simply won’t admit that you were wrong. Your ego completely blocks that possibility out.
> Your bias prevents you from making the truly logical maneuver similar to how a christian who's been worshipping Christ for 20 years won't be able to give up his religion based off of a logical argument.
Projection at its finest. Tell me, how aware are you of your lack of self-awareness?
Or perhaps a less loaded question: how did you come to the conclusion that you’re oh-so-rational? That’s epistemology, by the way. We both know you’re smug as hell, but the reasons why are not currently explainable by science, so to epistemology we turn.