Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

fs.blog

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 171 posts

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#71

Post by brnt »

vffhfhf wrote: post #59

Life is simple.. If you aim lower. There was a psychology research on how people even billionaire form a baseline similar to a homeless dude. All the stress, pressure you have is the same as everybody else and it will never change. So the goal should be do whatever you enjoy while doing the minimum effort.. Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere.

Would it? People perform better when not stressed. Lazyness is a big driver for invention. Actual research is already done driven by pure interest, not driven by ambition.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#72

Post by raxxorrax »

BLKNSLVR wrote: post #61
nathanvanfleet wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember talking to a coworker friend of mine who was a cat owner. She said that she didn't understand dogs. They just loved you unconditionally all the time no matter what. So I guess she liked the life with the cat where it was just randomly mean or not interested in her sometimes. Kind of illustrated things to me.

You gotta earn it with a cat. Dogs are for people that need the reassurance of the unconditional love Cats are for people who have the kind of levels of self-confidence that makes the unconditional love of a dog both suffocatingly annoying and suspicious.

Dogs love everyone. Never as much as the cake on the table perhaps.

They are also much smarter than cats, which cat owners have problems to admit in their confidence.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#73

Post by toper-centage »

carabiner wrote: post #15

I see this all around me. People are fixated on careers, hobbies (FOMO), spread thin by family obligations and errands. The truth is, happiness does not derive from these things. This "busyness" is an invention. Life is simple, and happiness actually derives from having cats.

Life is simple*

* YMMV. You might need to live in a developed world that assures you won't be left to die, that is not at war, that you can find a way to sustain yourself, and that you're not involved in any accidents that drastically change your otherwise simple life.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#74

Post by praptak »

vffhfhf wrote: post #59

Life is simple.. If you aim lower. There was a psychology research on how people even billionaire form a baseline similar to a homeless dude. All the stress, pressure you have is the same as everybody else and it will never change. So the goal should be do whatever you enjoy while doing the minimum effort.. Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere.

> Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere.

Yes. Would it be a problem though? If everybody is happy with what they have, then progress is unnecessary or even harmful.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#75

Post by rimliu »

raxxorrax wrote: post #72
BLKNSLVR wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You gotta earn it with a cat. Dogs are for people that need the reassurance of the unconditional love Cats are for people who have the kind of levels of self-confidence that makes the unconditional love of a dog both suffocatingly annoying and suspicious.

Dogs love everyone. Never as much as the cake on the table perhaps. They are also much smarter than cats, which cat owners have problems to admit in their confidence.

The first statment makes the second one very dubious.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#76

Post by rimliu »

adrianN wrote: post #50
mrfox321 wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What effort and cost? They're so cheap and easy to take care of. Maybe I'm being too generous since I am using dogs as a reference point.

Travel becomes a lot harder if you have a cat.

Get a cat, save the planet!

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#77

Post by _zamorano_ »

BLKNSLVR wrote: post #61
nathanvanfleet wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember talking to a coworker friend of mine who was a cat owner. She said that she didn't understand dogs. They just loved you unconditionally all the time no matter what. So I guess she liked the life with the cat where it was just randomly mean or not interested in her sometimes. Kind of illustrated things to me.

You gotta earn it with a cat. Dogs are for people that need the reassurance of the unconditional love Cats are for people who have the kind of levels of self-confidence that makes the unconditional love of a dog both suffocatingly annoying and suspicious.

A cat is a dumb version of a human. Who needs a cat when you have your couple and friends?

A dog is something different and special

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#78

Post by draugadrotten »

praptak wrote: post #74
vffhfhf wrote: post #59

Life is simple.. If you aim lower. There was a psychology research on how people even billionaire form a baseline similar to a homeless dude. All the stress, pressure you have is the same as everybody else and it will never change. So the goal should be do whatever you enjoy while doing the minimum effort.. Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere.

> Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere. Yes. Would it be a problem though? If everybody is happy with what they have, then progress is unnecessary or even harmful.

There are certain parts of the world where this type of thinking is common. If you can eat today and the sun is shining, why work harder?

Then next year, a draught and famine strikes, killing thousands or even hundreds of thousands.

Is it a problem? Is it harmful? Depends on your philosphy.

Re: Why Life Can’t Be Simpler

#80

Post by Fishysoup »

vffhfhf wrote: post #59

Life is simple.. If you aim lower. There was a psychology research on how people even billionaire form a baseline similar to a homeless dude. All the stress, pressure you have is the same as everybody else and it will never change. So the goal should be do whatever you enjoy while doing the minimum effort.. Of course this type of thinking would immediately hamper progress everywhere.

Maybe you meant something slightly different, but I will agree with other comments that this wouldn't hamper progress. Most people don't enjoy doing nothing for protracted periods of time. We like to create things and make stuff happen. I think we'd make more progress, if anything.
Post reply on HN