Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would imply non-tech people having some surprisingly deep visibility into technical details. What they really see is Excel vs. some contractor doing "a system". The reality is that Excel is available today and works, and scales up... well, until it doesn't. Still, you have data entry that everybody in the field understands, that's rock solid (so no need to unit test anything), and has a tried and true authentica…
Not to mention the "system" solution will have to go through its own debugging and will undoubtedly have bugs in it for some time after initial release. On top of that, there is STILL room for human error as a user is still the one actually inputting data and designing the experiment/data flow. I'm going to get mauled on this forum given the audience, but parent comment reeks of the technical elitism on this forum an…
Doing code reviews in Excel is hard if the developers are pathologically disciplined. It's impossible most of the time.
And so is debugging.
It's very unlikely any such system would face these limitations and would silently ignore data the same way Excel did.