This is indeed user incompetence, but so far every news source quoted the official PR and said it was an "Excel Problem". Microsoft PR was caught unprepared - I wonder how they'll re-spin it in the next few days (and for the first time that I can recall, a Microsoft product was wrongly blamed...) Pay attention, how every time there's a Windows virus or worm, it's a "Computer Virus", but in the (extremely rare) occasi…
The way I heard it, it was an Excel problem: They had a CSV file that had more than 1 million lines, and Excel dropped the lines beyond 1 million. I can imagine an automated process that appended to the CSV and then Excel saving back to that same file with the lines stripped. I hope we can all agree that this is not the way Excel or any other software should behave, whether the user is incompetent or not.
Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
141–150 of 834 posts
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#142Good lord. Old XLS files. I'd love to have seen how this was concocted.
e.g. some old versions of Crystal Reports can only do XLS. There must be loads old systems around that can only do XLS
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you read the article (perhaps its been updated?), they were using the old XLS format and they hit the limit at 64,000 lines PHE had set up an automatic process to pull this data together into Excel templates so that it could then be uploaded to a central system and made available to the NHS Test and Trace team as well as other government computer dashboards. The problem is that the PHE developers picked an old fil…
Did they pick XLS because it's easier to parse or something? I can't imagine why someone would pick a format that was largely replaced 10 years ago.
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you read the article (perhaps its been updated?), they were using the old XLS format and they hit the limit at 64,000 lines PHE had set up an automatic process to pull this data together into Excel templates so that it could then be uploaded to a central system and made available to the NHS Test and Trace team as well as other government computer dashboards. The problem is that the PHE developers picked an old fil…
Did they pick XLS because it's easier to parse or something? I can't imagine why someone would pick a format that was largely replaced 10 years ago.
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#145Overblown, IMO - only the useless absolute figure is affected, so it just creates another reason it's useless. Unless positive result files are more likely to exceed the file size limit than negative ones, of course, which I haven't heard suggested is the case. Edit: Perhaps I should clarify that I'm not suggesting it isn't a cockup. I just don't see it as a massive scandal that renders the data useless - it just dec…
Care to explain why you think the absolute figure is useless?
Most people who had covid by August (which was at least 6%, or 4 million, in the UK according to antibody tests) caught it between start of February and end of April. That's at least 3.5 million over 90 days, or 40k a day on average. Peak was likely double, maybe even treble that, given lockdown on 23rd of March dramatically cut infections.
We're likely testing somewhere in the region of 50% of actual cases. There's the non-symptomatic cases where about equal to the number of symptomatic cases, so double the absolute number -- some with symptoms will refuse to be tested because they don't want to miss work, some without will be caught by contact tracing, those two groups probably cancel each other out.
As such I'd expect 50k/day to be the "March equivelent" - with doubling every 10 days that means another 2 or 3 weeks.
It's not just about absolute cases though. Cases have been doubling roughly every 10 days, as have deaths. Deaths lag cases by 2-3 weeks, so I'd expect deaths in 20 days to be continuing to double even if we all stayed in an isolated booth from now.
Ultimately the concern is we're heading into flu season when hospitals are stretched, and cases, hospital admissions, and deaths are all increasing.
Hopefully flu season will be milder due to social distancing and due to more vulnerable people having been killed off, but either way we need to get a grip soon. Or just abandon any pretense of trying to stop its spread.
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you read the article (perhaps its been updated?), they were using the old XLS format and they hit the limit at 64,000 lines PHE had set up an automatic process to pull this data together into Excel templates so that it could then be uploaded to a central system and made available to the NHS Test and Trace team as well as other government computer dashboards. The problem is that the PHE developers picked an old fil…
Did they pick XLS because it's easier to parse or something? I can't imagine why someone would pick a format that was largely replaced 10 years ago.
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#147Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#148My mind is blown how can you do any real change in the world without good data? We need exact classification of the data of dead people. If they had COVID, was it the main source of death, real cause of death, was it diagnosed(tested) or not...ect. Until then, this stuff about COVID is total bullshit and you are being deceived and you are being to scared. SNAP OUT OF IT!
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#149Good lord. Old XLS files. I'd love to have seen how this was concocted.
Re: Missing Covid-19 test data was caused by the ill-thought-out use of Excel
#150Then I wonder, is there any tool that mimic Excell but with Sqlite as the backend? The limit of rows in Sqlite is 2 raised to the power of 64 (18446744073709551616 or about 1.8e+19).