Benchmarking static website hosting providers
1–10 of 66 posts
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#2Too bad about that, looks like I'm going to have to rethink my setup of having them cache my site on their edge.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#3However custom domains (i.e. not appspot.com) have an increased latency that can be a huge issue in some regions, like Oceania.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#4Netlify is an outlier in this comparison. For them, static site hosting is their core product, bread and butter if you will. To have such mediocre performance, as well as a relatively bad time to first byte is quite surprising.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#5https://www.pierbover.com/posts/static-hosting-benchmark-202...
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#6I ran a similar benchmark for time to first bite with a Heroku site behind CloudFlare and since the Heroku edges location varied wildly, latency varied wildly as well. CloudFront in front of an S3 bucket in the same location would likely really fast. That said when you get hit by a bot attack using your registration form to spam QQ emails, you would be putting CloudFlare in front and that might be worth a benchmark as well.
One thing I would improve: benchmark of hosting provider speed and then benchmark the CDNs in front of specific hosting providers. If your hosting gives you a static IP to connect to your CDN, the speed will be less varied.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#7Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#8I’ll need to see more benchmarks with a range of methodologies before I go in and redo how my portfolio is deployed, but this sure got me started searching.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#9CloudFlare's slowness is extremely surprising to me. From my house in Greece, I get a one millisecond ping to 1.1.1.1 (devices in my house have higher pings), so I was assuming that would carry over to their caches. Too bad about that, looks like I'm going to have to rethink my setup of having them cache my site on their edge.
Re: Benchmarking static website hosting providers
#10CloudFlare's slowness is extremely surprising to me. From my house in Greece, I get a one millisecond ping to 1.1.1.1 (devices in my house have higher pings), so I was assuming that would carry over to their caches. Too bad about that, looks like I'm going to have to rethink my setup of having them cache my site on their edge.
1.1.1.1 doesn’t serve your websites. You’ll have to ping a hosted page.