Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#2Ironically I’m having a hard time getting this blog post to load.
Images aren’t appearing as well.
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#3I am not sure whether 20 development days invested for a postmark score is a good time investment.
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#4I am not sure whether 20 development days invested for a postmark score is a good time investment.
It looks like the accessibility score went down, too.
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#5It's down! Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20201001142018/https://wildbit.c...
Edit: seems to be back up but slow
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#6I am not sure whether 20 development days invested for a postmark score is a good time investment.
It looks like the accessibility score went down , too.
Hi, author here. Accessibility score went from 87 to 96. The second screenshot with a score of 86 was a preliminary result after introducing the fake widget. (Best Practices went from 86 to 100.)
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#7https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?ur... web.dev says 66 though
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#8https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?ur... web.dev says 66 though
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=... shows 99-100 every time I load it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Our mobile score is lower (86 according to PageSpeed), but I mention that in a blog post.
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#9Seems like the HN hug is lowering their FCP score by bogging down the server.
Re: Getting Postmark’s Lighthouse Performance Score to 100
#10The problem with being a slave to these Lighthouse scores is the test is only concerned with the one page you are testing. If you assume your visitor will only visit a single page on your site that's fine, but even if they visit a second page, nearly everything it suggests you do will make that second page load slower than if you had developed the page using the traditional methods- external CSS/JS files that apply to your entire site and can be cached.