Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bohra’s Husband and Bohra’s Father-in-Law had spent more than $850,000 on purchasing Amazon call options and common stock in order to trade > Amazon’s stock price increased 2.87% over the prior day’s closing price. > In total, accounts belonging to Bohra’s Husband, her Father-in-Law, and her 10 Mother-in-Law made a profit of approximately $664,000 Am I stupid? $850,000 * 1.0287 = $874,395, which is $24,395 profit.…
Options are effectively gambling on which way you think a stock will go, rather than traditional share investment, and has much bigger returns and losses.
SEC charges former Amazon finance manager and family with insider trading
141–143 of 143 posts
Re: SEC charges former Amazon finance manager and family with insider trading
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
Options are effectively gambling on which way you think a stock will go, rather than traditional share investment, and has much bigger returns and losses.
Options aren't gambling, they're typically used to hedge your position, hence the 100:1 leverage. You can easily hedge out entire positions with just a few contracts.
Re: SEC charges former Amazon finance manager and family with insider trading
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
These are not the same laws so it’s dumb to compare them. If Musk was caught front-running the market with trades before earnings them you would have a point.
I understand that these are not equivalent violations. That said it's not dumb to say that the SEC sure seems to be very selective in which laws they actually enforce with teeth versus which ones they seem to just let slide. If any other CEO had done what Musk has done, they would have been fired by their board, and hopefully the SEC would have fined them, and prevented them from serving as an executive in a publicly…