Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
11–20 of 231 posts
Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#12The most shocking detail:
> Uber’s vehicles had also been having what the company refers to as a bad experience—such as a sudden jerk or a potentially dangerous movement—every one-third of a mile on average.
That's really bad. While there are no uniform standards for what a "bad experience" entails, my general sense is that Waymo and Cruise (widely considered first and second) are doing 10-100x better by that metric.
Another damning bit:
> Uber couldn’t even get the prototype to drive a one-mile stretch between the unit’s two Pittsburgh offices, with the goal of shuttling employees back and forth
I don't even know what to say to that. If you can't make your cars work reliably on a known, one-mile stretch of road, what have you been doing for so many years?
[Disclaimer: I work for Lyft, but not on the self-driving car program.]
Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#13Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#14Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#15Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#16I’ve become less convinced that governments are going to prioritize autonomous driving over electric.
Edit: I realize that level 4 doesn't ask you to take over, so I've edited my comments to reflect that.
Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#17Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#18Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#19The real question should be: does driving a car requires human-level cognition?
Re: Uber Wasted $2.5B on Self-Driving Cars
#20The theoretical arguments about how self-driving cars are better than human drivers remain theoretical.