Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Vocabulary 90 – vocabulary learning automation

gsuite.google.com

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: Show HN: Vocabulary 90 – vocabulary learning automation

#11
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anki is fantastic for its flexibility, but for language learning I've found I reach a point of diminishing returns after a certain point. From personal experience, I've been pretty much sold on Stephen Krashen's theory of second language acquisition[1][2], which in practice focuses on comprehensible input. lingq.com is a pretty good way to learn a second language this way. I use it by uploading an ebook in my target…

Yes, I can mirror this experience for Anki! I still find it very useful though. About the comprehensible input theory I have been using this method consistently for almost a year now to teach myself Russian. It really really works. Initially I focused on learning grammar etc through online course etc but it didn't work for me. When I started focusing on consuming increasingly harder input in Russian (news articles, t…

> talkabl.com

This is fantastic. The LingQ UX is truly horrible and it has way too many unnecessary features, but as far as I knew it was the only thing available with what it offers. I end up paying a monthly subscription, even though I use a very small subsets of its features, just so I can upload ebooks to it.

I've had the same experience with comprehensible input while learning Dutch. The grammar acquisition is what I've found most interesting. I still know next to nothing about formal Dutch grammar rules, but I was able to pass a few B2 practice exams with good scores regardless. I could pick out the correct answer on the grammar questions through process of elimination because all of the other answers just don't feel right. It's also been great for those words and phrases that don't translate well to English. Just by seeing them over and over in different contexts the meaning just slowly accumulates over time without ever seeing it translated or defined.

What really sold me on the method was that learning only through input actually produced equal levels of improvement in my ability to produce output. My speaking and writing skills seem to consistently lag just a bit behind my reading and listening skills. I think it just takes a bit longer to learn new words and phrases at a deep enough level that just come naturally when producing output.

Re: Show HN: Vocabulary 90 – vocabulary learning automation

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I can mirror this experience for Anki! I still find it very useful though. About the comprehensible input theory I have been using this method consistently for almost a year now to teach myself Russian. It really really works. Initially I focused on learning grammar etc through online course etc but it didn't work for me. When I started focusing on consuming increasingly harder input in Russian (news articles, t…

> talkabl.com This is fantastic. The LingQ UX is truly horrible and it has way too many unnecessary features, but as far as I knew it was the only thing available with what it offers. I end up paying a monthly subscription, even though I use a very small subsets of its features, just so I can upload ebooks to it. I've had the same experience with comprehensible input while learning Dutch. The grammar acquisition is w…

Yeah this is more or less how I feel about the method too. Another big plus is unlike other methods studying with texts allows you to have unlimited lessons :) Your lessons are as limited as the corpus available for your target language online.

Keep it up my friend :)

Re: Show HN: Vocabulary 90 – vocabulary learning automation

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I can mirror this experience for Anki! I still find it very useful though. About the comprehensible input theory I have been using this method consistently for almost a year now to teach myself Russian. It really really works. Initially I focused on learning grammar etc through online course etc but it didn't work for me. When I started focusing on consuming increasingly harder input in Russian (news articles, t…

> talkabl.com This is fantastic. The LingQ UX is truly horrible and it has way too many unnecessary features, but as far as I knew it was the only thing available with what it offers. I end up paying a monthly subscription, even though I use a very small subsets of its features, just so I can upload ebooks to it. I've had the same experience with comprehensible input while learning Dutch. The grammar acquisition is w…

Yous should check out languagetools.io. Like LingQ, but with a much better UI, way cheaper and chill with non-premium users, and they fund a school in Africa as well.

Re: Show HN: Vocabulary 90 – vocabulary learning automation

#14
Hi, guys!

Thanks everyone for feedback! Just a little announcement: if you managed to play around with my app, there's a bug which prevents add-on settings from saving (thanks for one of you, who came across it). I'll try to fix it asap and let you know when ready.

Post reply on HN