Live data from Hacker News

foo@bar.com

bar.com

21–30 of 301 posts

Re: foo@bar.com

#21

Something that I’m surprised a lot of devs don’t know; there are official domains you’re supposed to use for documentation, testing, etc. They are specifically reserved by IANA for these purposes. Originally I think it was just example.com, but they now have a list of all them: https://www.iana.org/domains/reserved

But I don’t see example.com listed there...

Re: foo@bar.com

#22

This guy is really committed to the joke, seeing as how he could easily sell bar.com for millions of dollars. Note also that there is a .bar gTLD, and there is a foo.bar domain as of 2014 (though it doesn't seem to be hosting any content). I run the .foo gTLD, and bar.foo is a real domain (though admittedly not as good as foo.bar). There is no .baz; next round maybe?

How does one get to run a TLD?

Through ICANN: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program

Re: foo@bar.com

#23

Something that I’m surprised a lot of devs don’t know; there are official domains you’re supposed to use for documentation, testing, etc. They are specifically reserved by IANA for these purposes. Originally I think it was just example.com, but they now have a list of all them: https://www.iana.org/domains/reserved

But I don’t see example.com listed there...

Try Ctrl+F. It's at the top.

Re: foo@bar.com

#24
post #10
post #2

this makes me wonder about what volume of mail an MX for contoso.com would receive, if microsoft didn't own the domain. https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&hs=ujt&channel=f...

contoso.com does have MX records. $ dig +short -t mx contoso.com 10 contoso-com.mail.protection.outlook.com.

As does 'fabrikam.com', but interestingly doesn't seem to be on outlook.com....

Re: foo@bar.com

#25
post #19

This guy is really committed to the joke, seeing as how he could easily sell bar.com for millions of dollars. Note also that there is a .bar gTLD, and there is a foo.bar domain as of 2014 (though it doesn't seem to be hosting any content). I run the .foo gTLD, and bar.foo is a real domain (though admittedly not as good as foo.bar). There is no .baz; next round maybe?

bar.foo redirects to careers.google.com. Nice joke. ;)

Yeah, it used to be a programming problem challenge website feeding into recruiting efforts. It was turned down though after living out its useful life and now it's just a redirect.

Re: foo@bar.com

#27

Something that I’m surprised a lot of devs don’t know; there are official domains you’re supposed to use for documentation, testing, etc. They are specifically reserved by IANA for these purposes. Originally I think it was just example.com, but they now have a list of all them: https://www.iana.org/domains/reserved

A lot of people learned this the hard way when Google bought and later enabled permanent HSTS for the .dev domain (prior to actually publicly releasing it) in Chrome, breaking everybody's non https local .dev environments. As mentioned above, it should have been .test

The HSTS preloading fortunately ended up being an unintentional additional type of Controlled Interruption period, which was a good thing in the end. It would've been a lot worse if, one day, your fake domain names are resolving locally, and then literally the next day it's now a real domain name that's resolving remotely, with who knows what result. This at least forced people to address it well in advance of domain names potentially resolving globally.

https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12...

https://jdebp.eu/FGA/dns-use-domain-names-that-you-own.html

Re: foo@bar.com

#29

Something that I’m surprised a lot of devs don’t know; there are official domains you’re supposed to use for documentation, testing, etc. They are specifically reserved by IANA for these purposes. Originally I think it was just example.com, but they now have a list of all them: https://www.iana.org/domains/reserved

Note that `foo@bar.com` is frequently used to get around the email address requirement, so it is not really for testing. I wouldn't be surprised if prominent websites block any address from example.com or so.

But people who know and use the words foo and bar are almost exclusively developers, so they should know better eveb when typing a fake address to a random form. But it’s easy to type reflexively, without thinking, so I’m not surprised people do it.

Re: foo@bar.com

#30

This guy is really committed to the joke, seeing as how he could easily sell bar.com for millions of dollars. Note also that there is a .bar gTLD, and there is a foo.bar domain as of 2014 (though it doesn't seem to be hosting any content). I run the .foo gTLD, and bar.foo is a real domain (though admittedly not as good as foo.bar). There is no .baz; next round maybe?

I don’t think anyone is paying millions of dollars for domains any more. Maybe low six figures.
Post reply on HN