Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Well at least I thought so Android and ChromeOS are Marketplace-(App) Runtime NOT a Linux Distro >The Linux foundation for example, thinks Android is a Linux distribution Well they compare it with embedded Linux: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2013/03/intro-to-embedd... > Wikipedia and others list it as a distribution. No they don't: >>Android is a mobile operating system based on a modified version of the Lin…
What are the criteria required for an OS using the Linux kernel to be called a “distribution” then? Including GNU or free software in the definition seems arbitrary... Is there a class of applications (that aren’t apps from a store) that must be runnable? Or do you mean that distro is short for “GNU/Linux distribution”? I’m not arguing for/against (since it’s obviously a long-standing debate), what I’m interested in…
Neither ChromeOS nor Android expose the Linux kernel directly to userspace apps, so for them is irrelevant what kernel is being used.