Live data from Hacker News

Tables: Tracking work for teams

blog.google

21–30 of 375 posts

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#21

Interesting that they would launch this as a totally separate product and not as a part of G Suite. Do you think they want to create some distance between them and the rest of Google because ofd Google's reputation of shutting down products? Or maybe they want to launch a product outside the usual bureaucracy?

"At Area 120, we work on 20% projects 100% of the time."

It literally just has no backing by Google's corporate or business goals.

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#22
Apart from pulling the plug on products at random, why I'm sceptical is because this hasn't been introduced / used internally widely. Think of it like a product Google created, say Cloud, but doesn't use it itself. Oh wait. It doesn't.

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#24

It seems like some folks at Google just woke up to Airtable and launched a counter MVP. I do not really expect more from Google any more. When there are tough competitors, why would people use something else which does not even look quite finished? Google has reach (read search monopoly), so I guess that is an angle.

Google should be inspired by their more nimble competitors! Their main problem is not offering Tables as part of G Suite where it would boost their offerings in the office productivity space and deliver a more complete and coherent strategy. That is, if they are really commit to Tables and are ready to offer proper corporate support and maintenance...

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#25
post #4

This isn't part of GSuite and therefore isn't subject to the same SLA. I wonder if the pricing will stick like this forever or if it will eventually be bundled, since Microsoft already includes something like this in 365 (and many companies probably already pay someone else for this type of functionality, like Airtable). I'd be a little scared of paying for something in the Google incubator, knowing how they cull stu…

I'm surprised it isn't there from the start, but some flexibility to sell this into organizations which have other suites is probably valuable for getting a hook in. My guess would be that they'll move it into the bundle at some point, but if it fails they might be able to avoid the price of long-term maintenance.

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#27
post #4

This isn't part of GSuite and therefore isn't subject to the same SLA. I wonder if the pricing will stick like this forever or if it will eventually be bundled, since Microsoft already includes something like this in 365 (and many companies probably already pay someone else for this type of functionality, like Airtable). I'd be a little scared of paying for something in the Google incubator, knowing how they cull stu…

It also makes you wonder: If this isn’t part of GSuite, then where does it belong in the Google organisation?

If Tables is just it’s own thing, not related to search, GSuite, GCP or ads then it’s already dead. At some level it must suck to know that you’ve created a culture where people don’t even care to try out your new fancy gizmo, because they expect you to abandon to quickly it’s simply not worth investing you time in. Or does Google not know that how they’re perceived?

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#28
$10 a month! This does look really useful, and seems like a smart move: I like AirTable, but if they integrate this into gsuite then I'm way more likely to use it for random things.

Interesting to see it being paid though! The free tier seems very limited for a google product: 1000 rows, 100 tables, 50 bot actions... paid version is $10 a month. 1000 rows won't be enough for anything serious - so they must be really betting on people paying. I guess that's also why it's not integrated directly with GSuite?

Re: Tables: Tracking work for teams

#29

It seems like some folks at Google just woke up to Airtable and launched a counter MVP. I do not really expect more from Google any more. When there are tough competitors, why would people use something else which does not even look quite finished? Google has reach (read search monopoly), so I guess that is an angle.

This. I love the preamble about the author being in tech for awhile and 10 years at Goog as if that gives any credibility to a blatant rip off.
Post reply on HN