Live data from Hacker News

FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

forumserver.twoplustwo.com

371–380 of 402 posts

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This post really highlights the needs for collapsible threads. I'd be very interested in discussing more about asset forfeiture at large, but it's ridiculous to have to wade through all the Liberty Dollar bullshit in order to do that.

Here you go: http://alexander.kirk.at/2010/02/16/collapsible-threads-for-...

Very nice, that helps a lot.

Still, though, this feature really should be part of HN proper, especially since it's so simple to implement. I think a lot more attention would hit posts that aren't already at the top, which would encourage people to write new posts instead of responding to whatever happens to be above the fold.

It's not going to fix the comment quality problems, but it would give a bump in the direction of wider, shallower comment trees, which will probably help a bit (deeply nested comments tend to either meander off topic or degenerate into arguments between a couple of people).

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#374
post #308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you actually read the document, you would see that the document includes provisions for a court system under the very correct assumption that some people would read the document and come to different conclusions about just what the document means. The document does have a court system, but if you read it closely you'll realize that nowhere in it does it say that the courts have the ability to rule on the constitut…

Yes, but that decision was grounded in the courts' enumerated powers and strangely nobody has seen fit to overturn it by amendment despite having a whole 2 centuries in which to do so.

So if you realize you made a mistake 2 centuries ago it's absolutely too late to fix it?

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#375
post #281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Over the line? Why did they have to bribe a bank to accept their business? That's crazy! The liberty to conduct everyday business is the most important liberty we have. It's what puts bread on the table. The fact that they had to bribe a bank to open and use an account is really really sick.

It's not over the line; they wanted to do a business that's illegal in the states, so they (allegedly) committed crimes. If they had wanted they could have banned US players, and only accepted money from players in other countries. They didn't want to do that. I'm presuming most of the main people here don't live in the states, they are no doubt implementing their own personal Plan B's right now, and have already lan…

they wanted to do a business that's illegal in the states, so they (allegedly) committed crimes.

It's funny, but you do realize the government defines what is and what is not a crime? I only hope for your sake the government doesn't make your industry illegal. Otherwise you may have to bribe others to earn a living.

It's unfortunate that many don't realize this is just the beginning. There is a multitude of other industries which are on the "edge" and trust me, if this goes well for the government (3 billion profit) they will come after everyone else with full force!

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#377

And yet so many people are urging this same government to craft new "net neutrality" laws. Bewildering.

Well, net neutrality is to protect us from corporations. Protecting us from the government is something the government won't do.

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has been a criticism of ICANN since the very beginning of the internet. This has always been a serious problem, especially since ICANN was setup under the auspices of the Department of Commerce. And, i'd love to see your alternative proposal for who should run root DNS. Cause the US is nakedly political and partisan, but at least it's nakedly so. :\

I think you'll find that the internet is a few decades older than ICANN. But in ICANN's defence most people who participate in ICANN (remember it is a self selecting body) aren't happy about all the seizures either. I'm sure the mailing lists are going "full tilt" (pun intended) as we type.

Yes, fair enough, perhaps we can agree on world wide web, or public use of the internet? ;)

And of course, this puts ICANN at risk itself, as it's forced to explain or decry the seizures. The FBI is taking short term actions which will have long term effects. You gotta wonder if they've got lawyers who understand the implications of what they're doing.

Re: FBI seized PokerStars.com, FullTiltPoker.com, UB.com,... domain names

#380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This helps some I guess, but I don't think it'd be that hard to take out all or almost all of the hardcoded initialization nodes if they're able to get IRC taken down, too. btc really needs a more robust method to locate peers. IRC with a few hardcoded fallback nodes is not very decentralized imo.

Hardcoded nodes are only needed if that's your first start. After that bitcoin client collects a databases of nodes, listening to "addr" messages from the network. On the next restarts, it uses addresses from that database one by one. And there are about 300 hardcoded nodes right now from different countries.

I see. That's better I suppose. You just need a relatively easy way to update the seed nodes in case all of the included nodes are down. Does this exist? If not, maybe I'll add it to the client.
Post reply on HN