Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've highlighted the problem with public discourse in the country. "I'm going to choose to ignore all scientific evidence because my brother can't get a job and it feels like H-1B is the cause" - sadly applicable to any policy topic where politicians & media are taking advantage of people's emotions.
I am not ignoring scientific evidence. I read the paper, it is not convincing. This is not a double blind experiment, it simply looks at data and asserts causes. Take this paragraph: "An increase in the share of workers with an H-1B visa within an occupation, on average, reduces the unemployment rate in that occupation. The results indicate that a 1 percentage point increase in the share of workers with an H-1B visa…
Soft sciences are harder than hard sciences to do.
> No experiment was performed. > This is not a double blind experiment
Do you really think experiments are a reasonable approach to political questions?
I too dislike wish-washy science, but there really isn’t much other choice for many real world situations.