Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

news.ycombinator.com

181–190 of 247 posts

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As human beings, moderators have their own preferences which exist beyond the HN guidelines, and are not meta moderated, except in the aggregate. When a comment becomes dead, it's because some mods chose to vote it down, and fewer mods choose to revive it. The net effect is an expression of the prevailing culture. Your question about why this sometimes happens "immediately" is an interesting part of the dynamic.

Seems like the sibling comment also by leafboi shows that HN automatically makes dead, accounts with negative karma.

leafboi’s account was shadow banned, meaning that any new comments are automatically, immediately marked as [dead].

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#182
post #83
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Also I don't think most people can really tell when an idea is good. My heuristic is that if you google it and someone is doing it successfully, you know you had a good idea, and it makes me happy. If you google it and nobody is doing it, it is a bad idea for some reason that’s not obvious.

And if you see $100 on the road, leave it there, it's fake or someone would have picked it up first.

All the times I have seen $100 on the road, it has turned out to be an advertisement i.e. fake. 50% of the time I have found money on the road, it has been my own.

I put coins on the road for people to find, because I remember the joy of discovering a coin as a child.

Overall it works as a joke, but fails as a metaphor for me!

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#183

One of my favorites is a super-long one by a user named bane, about three solutions to speeding up computing: (1) "high" (more RAM, CPU), (2) "wide" (more machines), and (3) "deep" (refactoring), which is what he recommends first. More than once he has rewritten something that was running slowly even on the latest and greatest architectures (perhaps partially because of that), to running on a single machine, even an…

Horizontal and vertical scalability is something people have been talking about for decades.

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#184
John Nagle commenting on Nagle's algorithm:

To avoid network congestion, the TCP stack implements a mechanism that waits for the data up to 0.2 seconds so it won’t send a packet that would be too small. This mechanism is ensured by Nagle’s algorithm, and 200ms is the value of the UNIX implementation.

> Sigh. If you're doing bulk file transfers, you never hit that problem. If you're sending enough data to fill up outgoing buffers, there's no delay. If you send all the data and close the TCP connection, there's no delay after the last packet. If you do send, reply, send, reply, there's no delay. If you do bulk sends, there's no delay. If you do send, send, reply, there's a delay.

> The real problem is ACK delays. The 200ms "ACK delay" timer is a bad idea that someone at Berkeley stuck into BSD around 1985 because they didn't really understand the problem. A delayed ACK is a bet that there will be a reply from the application level within 200ms. TCP continues to use delayed ACKs even if it's losing that bet every time.

> If I'd still been working on networking at the time, that never would have happened. But I was off doing stuff for a startup called Autodesk.

> John Nagle

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9048947

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#185
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It can be fun to think of "new" ideas, and then search the Internet for them. This week, I wanted a handheld device to push buttons and open doors without touching them; found several for sale (though the models without covers seem useless.) Later I wanted a 3D support structure to fit under a mask and increase its usable surface area; found several for sale.

I think I'm fairly creative, but I've only had one or two ideas that weren't reinventions of something someone else had already done. Doesn't matter what it is: software, electrical circuit, some clever mechanical thing, it's almost always already been done. Even if you look at patent grants, almost none of them are truly novel.

So what did you do with those ideas?

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#186
post #178
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure if I'm surprised that dang didn't touch on to mention downvotes as an even more rapid "contrarian dynamic" mechanism; wouldn't it be nice if downvotes had a little more friction, effort required for the action - like qualitative text from the downvoter as to why a comment is being downvoted to then allow OP the opportunity to clarify or expand on their comment - "to be more reflective and therefore bette…

> wouldn't it be nice if downvotes had a little more friction Upvotes have much less friction. Downvoted posts are not merely downvoted, they are also not upvoted. Why don't people upvote posts that are unfairly downvoted?

What if a downvote cost you dharma- and what if the downvoted person could invest their own dharma to keep the post "buyont". You could even specify min or max points- if your comment was a hill to die upon for..

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#188
post #179
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you point to a good example of an interaction space designed this way?

Start with Jan Gehl or B.V. Doshi. EDIT: Also check out and explore - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_place

Are you claiming that pubs and barbershops were designed based on an understanding of human behavior? It seems more like they've evolved over centuries, with everyone copying features that worked. Every time some architect tries to reinvent them based on theoretical principles of human interaction, the result sucks.

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#189
post #109

On what should you be: > This guy has gone to the zoo and interviewed all the animals. The tiger says that the secret to success is to live alone, be well disguised, have sharp claws and know how to stalk. The snail says that the secret is to live inside a solid shell, stay small, hide under dead trees and move slowly around at night. The parrot says that success lies in eating fruit, being alert, packing light, movi…

That zoo clearly didn't have any humans in it.

Re: Ask HN: Your Favourite HN Comment?

#190
post #101
post #5

For me, it's this comment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 ) that argued Dropbox wasn't useful and was going to fail. Both the comment and its replies (by Drew at the time when Dropbox wasn't known) really get to me because they remind me to keep an open mind to other people's ideas and have conviction in my own ideas even if there are people who doubt them.

Predates HN, but the famous Slashdot review of the first iPod is one of those “moments in history” events when nobody really had any inkling of the coming change > No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. https://m.slashdot.org/story/21026

Like "640k is enough for everybody", the iPod review isn't as bad as it seems in retrospect. It's a review of the first version of the iPod, which was Mac only and actually wasn't a great product yet. It was a few years and 2 versions later that they had a design breakthrough and started selling a lot of units. I don't think a reviewer should get dragged for not knowing that a product would be vastly improved a few versions later.

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/09/08/640k-enough/

https://www.lifewire.com/number-of-ipods-sold-all-time-19995...

Post reply on HN