Live data from Hacker News

Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

bloomberg.com

21–30 of 401 posts

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#21

IMO the forced sale of TikTok is very worrying for American production in China; in any future escalation China will likely use that same move as a card to play.

Haven’t they been doing that already? At least requiring companies to use data centers in country so they can siphon/spy on the data? Is that any less nefarious than a forced sale in order to operate in the country? I’d argue at least it’s more explicit (to sell).

He must not be aware that Google, Youtube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Whatsapp, Netflix & hundreds more are completely banned in China.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#23
post #4

I always wondered how we squared disallowing things like WeChat and TikTok with freedom of speech. This whole thing feels a bit hyperbolic. Is there real danger lurking around the corner if we allow people to shit post on TikTok, for instance? Genuinely curious here.

The danger lies in letting a foreign government controll the communication of americans. But for me as a german, I actually neither want the chinese, nor the US-government (nor the german government) to controll my communication.

It hardly seems like this is what is happening, though.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#24
post #10

I have been studying Chinese for 7 years. Many of my Chinese friends live in Los Angeles and WeChat is central in their life... Getting a job, taking orders, doing all kinds of business, paying for things. They don't know the phone numbers of their friends. Many don't speak English or their English is not very good. If it is completely cut off they will still find ways to communicate but arguably it will be more like…

Their usage of wechat is more likely a liability than a benefit. It gives a foreign adversary visibility into their activities in US. How can they become activist or work for change if their government is monitoring everything they say?

Do the Hong Kong protest crackdown not scare anyone else?

Now they have an excuse. It won’t look suspicious if they communicate to each other on channels that can’t be monitored by their oppressive government.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#25
post #10

I have been studying Chinese for 7 years. Many of my Chinese friends live in Los Angeles and WeChat is central in their life... Getting a job, taking orders, doing all kinds of business, paying for things. They don't know the phone numbers of their friends. Many don't speak English or their English is not very good. If it is completely cut off they will still find ways to communicate but arguably it will be more like…

Those are valid concerns. I also think the opposite side of that coin is worth considering. That is to say, should we allow WeChat to gain an even greater foothold on American soil or should we minimize total damage by cutting it off now instead of later? As for me, I believe allowing WeChat to become anything like the structural institution it is in China in any part of the US would be a mistake. Imagine if Google w…

For a long time, USPS was directly controlled by government, yet was also one of the only ways for people to communicate long distance. Government could easily have made laws like "we will read all your mail", or "we won't deliver mail to political enemies".

Yet that didn't happen. Why are things turning out differently in the internet age?

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#26
By far the most egregious overreach of Federal authority in recent memory. Noting about this is reasonable. Its 100% the act of a desperate and weak minded despot who knows nothing about technology but acts out of ignorance and pettiness. A truly illegal and Anti-American act.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#27

I think most of us expected this. Presidential power is far from absolute, and Trump clearly overstepped here.

I also expected the same arguments to prevail for TikTok though. It feels hard to argue that TikTok is somehow not a first amendment platform? The fact that political organising occurred on the platform should be case closed...

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#28

I think most of us expected this. Presidential power is far from absolute, and Trump clearly overstepped here.

Are you okay with China banning Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Whatsapp, Netflix & hundreds more American companies (which have no ties to the U.S Government), but you're *not okay with the U.S banning one app that has ties to the chinese government?

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#29
post #27

I think most of us expected this. Presidential power is far from absolute, and Trump clearly overstepped here.

I also expected the same arguments to prevail for TikTok though. It feels hard to argue that TikTok is somehow not a first amendment platform? The fact that political organising occurred on the platform should be case closed...

I don’t think Tiktok ever made it that far in the process so the question simply became moot after a change in ownership. Though I’ll be honest, I don’t really understand what’s going on with TikTok.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#30

When trying to understand China's commercial policies which America is supposedly retaliating against, consider that China has experienced a different mercantile history to America. America has never been invaded by foreign gunships and forced to allow foreign merchants to import opium to addict its citizens in order to fix their own countries balance of payments problems. Opium Wars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opi…

So the argument is china was once invaded by foreign gunships (not american) so they should be allowed to ban american companies (Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Whatsapp, Netflix & hundreds more) but allowed to operate any company they want in the U.S?
Post reply on HN