Live data from Hacker News

Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

bloomberg.com

11–20 of 401 posts

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#11

IMO the forced sale of TikTok is very worrying for American production in China; in any future escalation China will likely use that same move as a card to play.

Haven’t they been doing that already? At least requiring companies to use data centers in country so they can siphon/spy on the data? Is that any less nefarious than a forced sale in order to operate in the country?

I’d argue at least it’s more explicit (to sell).

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#12
post #4

I always wondered how we squared disallowing things like WeChat and TikTok with freedom of speech. This whole thing feels a bit hyperbolic. Is there real danger lurking around the corner if we allow people to shit post on TikTok, for instance? Genuinely curious here.

The danger lies in letting a foreign government controll the communication of americans.

But for me as a german, I actually neither want the chinese, nor the US-government (nor the german government) to controll my communication.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#13
post #7

> who argued that prohibitions would violate the free-speech rights of millions of Chinese-speaking Americans who rely on it for communication. By the same thinking Comcast should not be able to cut off someone's internet service (for not paying a bill) because doing so would violate that person's free speech rights (the ability to send email). Ditto for hosting providers, registrars and so on. In this case the gover…

ISPs, as a utility, should not be allowed and indeed in most places in the world aren't allowed to cut service from people unless it is necessary to maintain their operations.

The analogy breaks down here, allowing WeChat does not infringe on positive or negative liberty of much of anyone.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#14
post #7

> who argued that prohibitions would violate the free-speech rights of millions of Chinese-speaking Americans who rely on it for communication. By the same thinking Comcast should not be able to cut off someone's internet service (for not paying a bill) because doing so would violate that person's free speech rights (the ability to send email). Ditto for hosting providers, registrars and so on. In this case the gover…

But government did not establish the precise nature of imminent "national security" threat by these apps, nor did establish that these apps violated American laws.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#15

IMO the forced sale of TikTok is very worrying for American production in China; in any future escalation China will likely use that same move as a card to play.

Haven’t they been doing that already? At least requiring companies to use data centers in country so they can siphon/spy on the data? Is that any less nefarious than a forced sale in order to operate in the country? I’d argue at least it’s more explicit (to sell).

TikTok are already using US datacenters, and I'm willing to bet they're part of some kind of NSA program.

The issue with being forced to sell is that it's essentially economic warfare.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#16
When trying to understand China's commercial policies which America is supposedly retaliating against, consider that China has experienced a different mercantile history to America.

America has never been invaded by foreign gunships and forced to allow foreign merchants to import opium to addict its citizens in order to fix their own countries balance of payments problems.

Opium Wars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars

If America were to experience something like that, how might the experience change America's future commercial policies?

If Pearl Harbour and 9/11 are any guide, America might become less tolerant of foreign businesses operating in its markets.

But then, America is a complicated marketplace.

The Promotion and Marketing of OxyContin: Commercial Triumph, Public Health Tragedy

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2622774/

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#17
post #7

> who argued that prohibitions would violate the free-speech rights of millions of Chinese-speaking Americans who rely on it for communication. By the same thinking Comcast should not be able to cut off someone's internet service (for not paying a bill) because doing so would violate that person's free speech rights (the ability to send email). Ditto for hosting providers, registrars and so on. In this case the gover…

Comcast users are not protected from Comcast by the first amendment.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#18
post #8

Good. I didn't think the WeChat ban made much sense to begin with. Sidenote, I've noticed more and more people joining Telegram to evade a potential WeChat ban. I wonder if they're going to stay on Telegram.

There was never an actual ban for WeChat coming. It was just so they could point to WeChat and say "See, the ban wasn't entirely to force the sale of TikTok but one of protecting national interest!"

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#19
post #7

> who argued that prohibitions would violate the free-speech rights of millions of Chinese-speaking Americans who rely on it for communication. By the same thinking Comcast should not be able to cut off someone's internet service (for not paying a bill) because doing so would violate that person's free speech rights (the ability to send email). Ditto for hosting providers, registrars and so on. In this case the gover…

Free speech rights protect you from the government not private companies.

Re: Trump’s WeChat curbs halted by judge on free speech concerns

#20
post #10

I have been studying Chinese for 7 years. Many of my Chinese friends live in Los Angeles and WeChat is central in their life... Getting a job, taking orders, doing all kinds of business, paying for things. They don't know the phone numbers of their friends. Many don't speak English or their English is not very good. If it is completely cut off they will still find ways to communicate but arguably it will be more like…

Those are valid concerns. I also think the opposite side of that coin is worth considering. That is to say, should we allow WeChat to gain an even greater foothold on American soil or should we minimize total damage by cutting it off now instead of later?

As for me, I believe allowing WeChat to become anything like the structural institution it is in China in any part of the US would be a mistake. Imagine if Google was as controlled by and as much of a cheerleader for the US government as WeChat is for the Chinese, and the kind of threat that would pose to European sovereignty.

Post reply on HN