Earlier quoted context omitted.
Man, I’ve wanted the “compatible SQL engine with only RAM storage” for testing for YEARS. Closest I got was some shenanigans with MSSQL’s LocalDB.
I use docker to spin up new postgresql DBs on the fly
DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
81–90 of 167 posts
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Man, I’ve wanted the “compatible SQL engine with only RAM storage” for testing for YEARS. Closest I got was some shenanigans with MSSQL’s LocalDB.
I use docker to spin up new postgresql DBs on the fly
The overhead is actually pretty small, less than 10s. I'd saw too much for unit tests, but we'll within the tolerable range for integration/functional tests. Compared with the time I'd spend hacking together some brittle and unrealistic in-memory alternative, I much prefer to use a real database.
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#83Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#84Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#85Embeddable databases absolutely have legit use-cases, but I see them being used for projects where it'd have saved so much trouble to use a proper ORM (perhaps with sqlite support!) from the beginning.
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#86Is this backward compatible with SQLite?
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#87Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#88My bet was on embeddable, so SQLite, is that the right choice?
It seeems a nightmarish scenario to have 500 postgres instances running on client machines and being accessible from the internet albeit with security enabled and such...
am i right?
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#89I was discussing with a coworker what would be the best option, embbbedabble or service for a database runnning for a Windows GUI app. My bet was on embeddable, so SQLite, is that the right choice? It seeems a nightmarish scenario to have 500 postgres instances running on client machines and being accessible from the internet albeit with security enabled and such... am i right?
Re: DuckDB – An embeddable SQL database like SQLite, but supports Postgres features
#90I was discussing with a coworker what would be the best option, embbbedabble or service for a database runnning for a Windows GUI app. My bet was on embeddable, so SQLite, is that the right choice? It seeems a nightmarish scenario to have 500 postgres instances running on client machines and being accessible from the internet albeit with security enabled and such... am i right?
Countless mobile apps use SQLite.
We want to move data from COBOL files to a database, we're making our own migration tools/scripts in python (In order to mainly rename weird name table/column names to sanish ones), and we can target any SQL flavour/database we want to insert that data at.. the question is what's the better call here...
SQLite seems pretty good enough, at least until we can move our whole app to a more web-friendly environment at which point something like postgres might make more sense? but that could take a couple years... (we're a small team/company in a very specific niche/locale)