Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m going to ignore all the subjective incendiary rhetoric and focus on this (slightly edited) line: > [Those] who uncover state crimes are the enemy of the state. This is an interesting point, considering Snowdon made public improper behaviour, which resulted in him fleeing the country, while (at least some of) the improper behaviour has been declared illegal behaviour by a court of law. Meanwhile Snowdon remains pe…
>subjective incendiary rhetoric Its not rhetoric if you've had to dig your children out from under the rubble. I'm not surprised this is a scary subject, and that it is immensely important to the American public that it be kept hidden away beyond the state secrecy walls of privilege. The collateral damage video wasn't rhetoric, either. Again, innocent children being murdered for lies. Let us not forget Assange's mess…
I’m neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you.
I was simply trying to highlight a statement of fact from your post, and provide an example of this occurring.