You explicitly claimed it wouldn't be worse. Consider applying your own standards to that claim.
Consider also that it's possible to assert something without perfect knowledge of its truth. Usually context is sufficient to gather the level of certainty being expressed, or the implicit perspective from which it holds true, without hedging and defensively weakening every little statement.
> > Perhaps that's because you want the wrong thing for some reason.
> Allow me to make it very simple: You didn't give any reasons for your opinion. You just gave your opinion.
I'm glad you translated it because I'd never have gotten the second claim from the first. Phew.
> What about that speaks to "theory of the mind and epistemology" in your opinion?
Your entire objection, which seems to carry some unusual assumptions about the power and utility of thought experiments and the extent of the value of comparing similar, but not identical, things. Notably, it appears to reject them as being to any useful degree, even for evaluating a user-facing OS feature valid or enlightening.
> Gee, I wonder if your whole problem couldn't just be solved by letting you opt into the whole idea of PWA notifications?
Making them opt-in and off by default, ideally with no way for the app to tell whether they're enabled, would be an improvement, but allow me to repeat my reason from my post which, you claim, contained no reasons: I do not want features that make webapps more viable on iOS, because I do not like webapps and prefer an environment that makes me less likely to encounter them for any reason. So simply not having the feature would be even better.
[EDIT] nb. I entirely get disagreement with my position on a variety of grounds, but I find such apparent failure to even engage with it, and rejection that it is a position, harder to understand.