Live data from Hacker News

The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

axios.com

401–410 of 974 posts

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#401

> Housing is more expensive for them than prior generations I harp on this constantly. But housing is not more expensive in the majority of American metros. Adjusted for inflation the median cost per square foot of new housing is almost exactly the same as it was in 1990. (This doesn't even take into account that mortgage rates are drastically lower since then.) We get skewed on this for two reasons. One is because h…

> Two is that we're highly skewed to a handful of elite metros, whose housing markets are not representative of the country as a whole Right, but what matters is the housing price where people are. It doesn't matter what the housing market looks like in South Dakota if I don't want to live there. While houses in South Dakota may be 1/10 the price of houses in NYC (likely cheaper, honestly), they also have 1/10 the po…

Ok so the change from a decade or two ago is that young people want to live in places they can't afford. In the past they were evidently more content to live in places they could afford.

Doesn't really feel like cost of housing is what's changed.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#403
post #294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We might be talking about different budget levels, but to normal people (people who don't have the word 'software' in their job title), 200k in retirement is a lot. Actually the median 401k balance at retirement is only around 60k, so that alone would quadruple their retirement savings.

yeah, I'm assuming most of the people on this forum have upper-middle salaries or will likely have them in the future. I mostly wrote the post with this audience in mind, though I think the bit about analyzing spending in relation to your savings rate is relevant to everyone. I am very fortunate to have the opposite "problem": I tend to be very stingy and waste a lot of time and energy trying to save amounts of money…

> since this is a guaranteed payment until end of life, this is like having >$375k in a retirement account at age 67.

I would not bet on social security retirement age staying at 67, nor would I bet on the purchasing power of $15.5k remaining anywhere close to it is today.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#404
post #2

I am one of those people, though in my case it was not so much for cost saving reasons as it was the easiest means of leaving a coastal city that would clearly be hard hit by Coronavirus. oddly enough I'm morbidly curious about the decline in birth and marriage rates due to this whole episode. hard to hook up in your parent's home.

I'm curious as well but in the opposite. People are spending more time at home together, could there be a birth boom in Q1/Q2 of next year?

Anecdotally where I live several OB/GYNs (my wife is a resident) have told me they will be delivering a ton of babies over this upcoming winter, and that they are busier than ever - with obstetric cases.

Also anecdotally, we're expecting our first - we were waiting for the right time, had it all planned out.. then COVID pulled the rug out from under everything so we said screw it and just went for it. I suspect we're not alone in this...

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yeah, I'm assuming most of the people on this forum have upper-middle salaries or will likely have them in the future. I mostly wrote the post with this audience in mind, though I think the bit about analyzing spending in relation to your savings rate is relevant to everyone. I am very fortunate to have the opposite "problem": I tend to be very stingy and waste a lot of time and energy trying to save amounts of money…

> since this is a guaranteed payment until end of life, this is like having >$375k in a retirement account at age 67. I would not bet on social security retirement age staying at 67, nor would I bet on the purchasing power of $15.5k remaining anywhere close to it is today.

sure, don't lose track of the thread though. I'm comparing against someone who is currently retiring with $60k in their retirement account. $60k probably won't be the median 401k value in forty years. all this stuff is subject to change.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#406

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"just to buy a 3-4 bedroom" It should be noted, they don't build 2 bedroom homes anymore. I was talking to a real estate developer in Sacramento about this. New 3 bedrooms do exist, however, they would rather cram out the lot with a 5 bedroom since the cost to add on another few hundred square feet is nothing if you have the equipment and material right there. PLUS! People will go ahead and take on huge loans with th…

>It should be noted, they don't build 2 bedroom homes anymore I don't know if this is what you meant by this, but I do see this same argument come up a lot, and it's a great example of the "entitlement" I'm referring to. The only reason it would be relevant that they don't build 2 bedroom houses anymore is if you for some reason think you must have a newly built houses. The old 2 bedroom houses didn't suddenly disapp…

"The only reason it would be relevant that they don't build 2 bedroom houses anymore is if you for some reason think you must have a newly built houses."

Yep. Hence "they don't build 2 bedroom homes anymore"

"The old 2 bedroom houses didn't suddenly disappear."

They didn't. But the population is growing.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#407
post #37

I think people need to start realising just how incredibly much the government is now stepping in at each of these crises to make them as smooth as possible. But there is a downside to this. You are not allowing the normal economic effects to happen because you are wanting to keep everything as it is, but then guess what, the status quo stays, and anyone joining the ladder is finding it increasingly difficult. What's…

"millennials shouldn't be arguing for more government intervention, but less" Your argument that government intervention is bad for millennials is flawed. Without government intervention such as eviction moratoriums, unemployment benefits and federal government stimulus checks there would have been massive homelessness. Prior to the pandemic 40% of americans could not cover a $400 emergency, all of these people would…

I don't really agree with that assessment. If there is mass layoffs for example, and renters can't pay rent, why would a landlord evict the tenant? Who is going to take their place? I think many landlords would prefer a potential to pay (owing rent) than full eviction and being forced to lower rent and uncertainty wouldn't they? I'm not saying there would be no evictions, but everyone homeless doesn't seem like a fully realistic outcome considering renting is a marketplace.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Among my friends that have bought houses, many of them have gone into significant debt just to buy a 3-4 bedroom house, even though they have no kids and only use one of the bedrooms, because they think that at some point in their life they will put them to use. Are you sure your friends aren't just being rational? I thought about the rent vs buy thing pretty constantly in my 20s and always came down on the rent si…

Sure. If you're being rational, it would possibly make sense to buy a 2 bedroom house or even a 3 bedroom if you think you might need an extra room for a kid plus a home office. But it's not as rational to insist that you need 4 bedroom house with a three car garage inside a top school district when you aren't even married/pregnant yet. Yes, life can change fast, but paying a premium mortgage for a top school distric…

It might end up cheaper overall then buying twice or renting and moving. Especially with prices rising every year. If you know you want kids one day and want to live in that area and paying that mortage still leaves you enough money to live, it easily ends up better deal.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#409
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

House prices will never fall significantly. As soon as a house enters the market at anything below the going rate it's bought by a landlord or a rental company. This will keep house prices high forever.

House prices can fall in real terms even if they don't in nominal terms. I think the is exactly the situation we are likely to see in an environment where the solution to every problem is "stimulus" and "money printer go brrrrrr" in response to the housing market taking a dive.

If the money printer only gives money to asset holders, the inflation will only happen in the asset economy, as opposed to the Main street economy.

This is what we saw with QE in 2008, and what we're seeing now. Asset prices are skyrocketing, while the price of bread is staying more or less stable.

Re: The majority of 18- to 29-year-olds in the US are now living with their parents

#410

> Housing is more expensive for them than prior generations I harp on this constantly. But housing is not more expensive in the majority of American metros. Adjusted for inflation the median cost per square foot of new housing is almost exactly the same as it was in 1990. (This doesn't even take into account that mortgage rates are drastically lower since then.) We get skewed on this for two reasons. One is because h…

What about other years? 1980? 1970? I would love to see this data over time. > homes today are substantially larger Is there any availability of smaller homes in actual markets? If I'm a buyer in the market do I even have the option to buy a cheap smaller home?

Since 1978 at least [0], not sure how much data you'll get further back.

[0]: https://www.supermoney.com/inflation-adjusted-home-prices/

Post reply on HN