Per [0], a possible answer to this seems to be that an arms dealer had connections to a company called Tardigrade Ltd. and all transactions with firms like these are prohibited which is why the word "Tardigrade" made it into PayPal's filter. As long as companies like PayPal have issues like that, or with moderation in case of Youtube, Twitter or Facebook, I'd claim neither of these companies have actually solved scal…
PayPal gets a list of banned strings from the Office of Foreign Asset controls. If any match those strings it's flagged for a review. This is more or less legally required for any company that moves money in the United States of America. You will probably find the same issues with the same terms on any other banking for financial body. Technically, these aren't being blocked. They're being audited. The payments will…
It’s up to the payment processor to have a process that ensures they don’t send payments to a blocked entity.
You can search for them here: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-as... and see the listing for the company in this notice: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/...
Note that the standard practice for handling an OFAC hit (e.g. payment to O Bin Laden) is to disambiguate your payee from the blocked individual/entity. This can be easy or difficult depending on how much info you have on the payee; if you have an address and nationality already that don’t match the sanctioned entity then you’re generally ok; typically you would collect a photo of the payee’s ID and run a manual check if there was any doubt.
These “enhanced due diligence” processes can be quite time consuming in aggregate, and I’m not surprised that PayPal isn’t running a detailed EDD process on transactions that will probably net it a few cents of fees.
Having said that, given the structure of their business (online checkout) I’m surprised that they are considering the product (eg “tardigrade”) as being relevant; they have account info on both the payor and payee so they know the payment isn’t going to the sanctioned Cypress company from the OFAC list. This isn’t a Venmo payment that says “pass this payment on to Tardigrade Inc”, which you would want to block.
This seems like either a bug in their screening code or some very risk-averse logic (maybe to do with low-value transactions).