Live data from Hacker News

Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

imperial.ac.uk

21–30 of 111 posts

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#21

> He won the Fields Medal in 2014 Damn. I'm sure he appreciates the $3M (elsewhere he joked that he could finally afford to buy a house in London) but the Fields Medal is a much bigger deal in the world of mathematics.

Which actually made me wonder - where/how do London academics live? I find it hard to imagine them commuting for hours from the suburbs - it does not seem very consistent with an academic life - but I do not see them being able to afford to live near their universities either.

The same way that everyone else does; buying a 1.5M 2 bed flat in Zone 1 isn’t possible on UK tech salaries either, even if you reach the top tiers for UK tech pay which usually tops at around £125K base you aren’t buying central London properties either.

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#22

This prize isn’t too highly regarded. The physics prize has mostly consisted of string theorists giving it to their friends in the field.

Asking out of ignorance. When the article says that

> The Breakthrough Prizes are the largest prizes in science

Do they mean the prize comes with more money?

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#23
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One thing I learned: he did his work while at Warwick. Warwick is kind of under-estimated among UK universities. It's reasonably well-run (which makes it almost unique), regularly hires smart people, and doesn't have the Brideshead Revisited hangover of Oxbridge.

Warwick is particularly well regarded for its mathematics department.

I thought it was well known it was ahead of Oxford for Maths, second only to Cambridge and Imperial

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which actually made me wonder - where/how do London academics live? I find it hard to imagine them commuting for hours from the suburbs - it does not seem very consistent with an academic life - but I do not see them being able to afford to live near their universities either.

FYI: How Stanford University handles that now is that they have a new subdivision on campus, and chosen professors are given title to a nice house. When they move later, they are given the assessed profit of any rise in house value over the years. This was necessary because house prices in Palo Alto are in the $2+ million range, which is not affordable to profs, and prevents them from the normal housing ladder invest…

it's kinda scary that the go-to personal investment plan is based on a leveraged buy & sell with the implied promise that things perpetually increase in value.

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#25

This prize isn’t too highly regarded. The physics prize has mostly consisted of string theorists giving it to their friends in the field.

"This prize isn’t too highly regarded."

[By whom?]

"The physics prize has mostly consisted of string theorists giving it to their friends in the field."

Firsty, the Breakthrough Prize is given in Life Sciences, Mathematics and Fundamental Physics. This post is about the Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics.

As for Fundamental Physics, apart from 2019 (special) for supergravity, it doesn't seem to go to string theorists:

2021 Special Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics -- Steven Weinberg, “continuous leadership in fundamental physics, with broad impact across particle physics, gravity and cosmology, and for communicating science to a wider audience.” [0]

2021 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics -- Eric Adelberger, Jens H. Gundlach and Blayne Heckel, University of Washington. Citation: For precision fundamental measurements that test our understanding of gravity, probe the nature of dark energy, and establish limits on couplings to dark matter. [1]

2020 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics was awarded to all 347 members of the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration representing 60 institutions in 20 countries. [2]

2019 Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics -- Charles Kane and Eugene Mele – University of Pennsylvania. Citation: For new ideas about topology and symmetry in physics, leading to the prediction of a new class of materials that conduct electricity only on their surface. [3]

2019 Special Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics -- Jocelyn Bell Burnell – University of Dundee and University of Oxford. Citation: For fundamental contributions to the discovery of pulsars, and a lifetime of inspiring leadership in the scientific community. [3]

2018 Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics -- WMAP experimental team. Citation: for detailed maps of the early universe that greatly improved our knowledge of the evolution of the cosmos and the fluctuations that seeded the formation of galaxies. [4]

There are some string theorists further in the past, but they still don't warrant the use of the word 'mostly'. [5]

[0] https://breakthroughprize.org/News/61

[1] https://breakthroughprize.org/News/60

[2] https://breakthroughprize.org/News/54

[3] https://breakthroughprize.org/News/47

[4] https://breakthroughprize.org/News/41

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakthrough_Prize_in_Fundamen...

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#26
post #12
post #4

There is a 2014 Quanta Magazine article on Martin Hairer which I found interesting. https://www.quantamagazine.org/hearing-music-in-noise-martin...

One thing I learned: he did his work while at Warwick. Warwick is kind of under-estimated among UK universities. It's reasonably well-run (which makes it almost unique), regularly hires smart people, and doesn't have the Brideshead Revisited hangover of Oxbridge.

Basically since Warwick was founded, it had a reputation for being the place people went to when they were rejected from oxbridge. This sounds bad but one subtlety with the U.K. system is that almost all students may apply to at most one of Oxford and Cambridge in any given year and those universities tend to get more sufficiently good applicants than they take in. If one of Oxford or Cambridge is commonly considered better than the other by applicants then Warwick the distribution of the abilities of the rejects is higher than if they had all applied to a single top university equal in size to the sum of Oxford and Cambridge. Therefore Warwick gets to take in lots of very good undergraduates.

The university was founded in the 60s out of what used to be a research retreat for mathematicians. At its inception a large portion of its mathematics department (at least the topologies) came directly from Cambridge (I believe the story is that Christopher Zeeman went around his colleagues telling them that all the others were going to Warwick). And in the mathematics department in particular has been strong ever since.

I believe the course structure is also different there than from oxbridge (or many other U.K. universities) in that it is meant to be more like an American university with more choice to pursue courses from different subjects or with wide varieties of specialisation.

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What an ignorant thing to say.

Examples of criticism of the physics prize: https://physicsworld.com/a/breakthrough-prize-criticized-for... http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11138 http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/08/special-breakthroug...

They are all related to a single award -- 2019 (special) for supergravity.

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which actually made me wonder - where/how do London academics live? I find it hard to imagine them commuting for hours from the suburbs - it does not seem very consistent with an academic life - but I do not see them being able to afford to live near their universities either.

I imagine that a knighted professor at Imperial can comfortably access a mortgage in London, so I doubt this applied to Martin Hairer. But, post-graduates in London (if they have no other source of support) do tend to have a difficult lifestyle. Not recommended.

No not really. With the average price of a house in London approaching £1m https://www.home.co.uk/guides/house_prices.htm?location=lond... and an average professor at Imperial earning £80k https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Salary/Imperial-College-London-P...

Re: Imperial mathematician scoops $3M Breakthrough Prize

#30
post #4

There is a 2014 Quanta Magazine article on Martin Hairer which I found interesting. https://www.quantamagazine.org/hearing-music-in-noise-martin...

here’s his paper that won him the prize. It’s long at 180 pages.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5113

Wish there was something between a Quanta article and the paper that described his thinking.

Post reply on HN