Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
11–20 of 401 posts
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#12Fred Baur, the inventor of the original Pringles can, was buried in one of them (on his request)
Like, buried in a giant replica of the can as a coffin? Or cremated and put in a normal size can?
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#13Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#14The way problems with it are treated as fundamentally unfixable always strikes me as against the site's ethos, yet people love pointing them out.
Recycling just gets dumped in landfill!
Ok, lets ban that.
But, actually, its more environmentally friendly to landfill it!
Are you sure? Science doesnt really agree. But anyway, can we make recycling more efficient?
No, stop trying to improve things. Recycling is bad. If it made sense the free market would already do it!
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#15I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. This is one of the big problems I have with recycling. When I was a kid in school (throughout the 90’s), we learned the 3 R’s: reduce, reuse, recycle. Notice that recycle is last on the l…
Recyclers are downstream from consumers. They can’t stop consumers from throwing away their pringles cans, and until Kellogg’s starts bulk-selling Pringles in bags… people will throw cans away, there’s noly do many cans you can find a use for.
I can’t find any specific production numbers but the internet tells me Kellogg’s sells for billions in snacks and pringles are a significant fraction of that. A Pringle can is a buck or two, meaning 6 figures Pringle cans being sold every year, if not 7.
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#16I have mason jars that my grandmother and then my mother used for pickling. The only waste is the rubber ring which needs to be replaced occasionally and THAT could be recycled. Many of these bottles have been used for 80+ years now. I have a few Ball jars which my GREAT grandmother used 100+ years ago.
Beer bottles in Canada are reused dozens of times and are recyclable (brown glass) when broken or worn out.
The only containers which are infinitely recyclable are aluminum and coloured glass (nearly), but that takes energy.
Plastics are not currently infinitely recyclable as the polymer chains break down. A lot of plastic is simply not recyclable at all in most of North America [1]
We need to just force manufacturers to bear the costs of recycling their products 100%: everybody would switch to reusable and this current clam shell packaging disaster would come to a close.
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#17I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. This is one of the big problems I have with recycling. When I was a kid in school (throughout the 90’s), we learned the 3 R’s: reduce, reuse, recycle. Notice that recycle is last on the l…
> I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. Recyclers are downstream from consumers. They can’t stop consumers from throwing away their pringles cans, and until Kellogg’s starts bulk-selling Pringles in bags… people will throw ca…
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#18Recycling mentioned on Hacker News always depresses me. The way problems with it are treated as fundamentally unfixable always strikes me as against the site's ethos, yet people love pointing them out. Recycling just gets dumped in landfill! Ok, lets ban that. But, actually, its more environmentally friendly to landfill it! Are you sure? Science doesnt really agree. But anyway, can we make recycling more efficient? N…
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#19I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. This is one of the big problems I have with recycling. When I was a kid in school (throughout the 90’s), we learned the 3 R’s: reduce, reuse, recycle. Notice that recycle is last on the l…
> I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. Recyclers are downstream from consumers. They can’t stop consumers from throwing away their pringles cans, and until Kellogg’s starts bulk-selling Pringles in bags… people will throw ca…
There’s no way they’ll sell Pringles in bags though; they’re way too delicate for anything but a purpose-built rigid container.
Re: Pringles tube tries to wake from 'recycling nightmare'
#20I love Pringles tubes. We reuse them all over the place around the house. Never really thought of recycling them. Seems like a terrible waste to destroy a perfectly good container just to get a ~penny’s worth of materials out of it. This is one of the big problems I have with recycling. When I was a kid in school (throughout the 90’s), we learned the 3 R’s: reduce, reuse, recycle. Notice that recycle is last on the l…