Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
richardlewis.org
Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#2The first Microsoft Word was released in 1983. It featured graphics video mode and mouse support in a WYSIWYG interface. It could run in text mode or graphics mode but the visual difference between the two was minor. In graphics mode, the document and interface were rendered in a fixed font size monospace character grid with italic, bold and underline features that was not available in text mode. It had support for style sheets in separate files (.STY).
The first version of Word was a 16 bits PC DOS/MS-DOS application. A Macintosh 68000 version named Word 1.0 was released in 1985 and a Microsoft Windows version was released in 1989. The three products shared the same Microsoft Word name, the same version numbers but were very different products built on different code bases. Three product lines co-existed: Word 1.0 to Word 5.1a[6] for Macintosh, Word 1.0 to Word 2.0 for Windows and Word 1.0 to Word 5.5 for DOS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Word#Word...
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#3This stirred my memory of another terrific HN post on the history of Word for Windows 1.0:
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#4I still have my green & white steel-balled mouse somewhere :) CGA/EGA gfx mode was pretty bad though, so still used EGA text mode in WW until final editing. (But it beat Electric Pencil in all upper case lol.)
I really miss the slow-burn green screen w/the Hercules text card though -- esp. as a 2nd screen for debugging.
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#5Lack of contrast makes this impossible to read without reader mode.
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#6Interesting article, thanks for sharing.
> Development on the word processor called Microsoft Word for DOS was started by Richard Brodie and others in 1982
Wasn't it rather Charles Simonyi and others?
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#7Thanks for the little trip down memory lane.
Despite the much greater scale that modern tech gives us in almost every way, there is still something special about the early PC era, when an enthusiastic geek really could know every command that DOS provided (because your PC came with a manual that described them all and you could read it cover to cover in a few hours) and understand how the OS worked all the way down and what all the DOS and BIOS APIs (as we’d call them today) were for.
In those days, you could write your own toy programs by running your debugger, manually entering assembly language into some memory, and then writing the memory from that address verbatim to a .com file, which DOS would happily load and run similarly verbatim (so make sure you remembered to exit at the end, or you’d end up executing whatever was randomly in the memory just after your program).
Given luxuries like a higher level programming language, a real compiler and an interactive text editor, a single programmer could even write a useful application like a compiler or word processor or game to a professional standard within a reasonable amount of time. Though, as this article reminds us, sometimes you had to jump through some hoops that seem quite eccentric by modern standards to do it.
For the record, I have never been a fan of pink shirts on book covers, though as defining moments in your life go, getting that book as a curious and very nerdy teenager was probably one of mine. I guess today the equivalent would be finding some tutorial videos on YT or copying and pasting lots of code from SO, but somehow I doubt any of the kids learning to program like that ever enjoys the same feeling of truly understanding your PC and how you can use it that we had back then. Or maybe there are secretly clubs of 13-year-olds making a ground-up Linux distribution that will take over the world running on Raspberry Pi supercomputers and open hardware smartphones in 10 years and I’m just too out of touch to know about it. ;-)
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#8Interesting article, thanks for sharing. > Development on the word processor called Microsoft Word for DOS was started by Richard Brodie and others in 1982 Wasn't it rather Charles Simonyi and others?
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#9I still have my green & white steel-balled mouse somewhere :) CGA/EGA gfx mode was pretty bad though, so still used EGA text mode in WW until final editing. (But it beat Electric Pencil in all upper case lol.) I really miss the slow-burn green screen w/the Hercules text card though -- esp. as a 2nd screen for debugging.
I've heard tell of the dual-screen DOS machine with a Hercules. How did this actually work? Did special debuggers support it, or something?
Re: Compiling Word for Windows v1.1a
#10This is dredging up some long-unused memories but you should be able to get a bit more memory by supplying the RAM parameter to emm386. Get yourself some upper memory blocks (UMBs) - usable memory above the 640 K mark.
DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS RAM HIGHSCAN
Then use FILESHIGH to set the file count.
FILESHIGH=30