I used to be in the habit of emailing myself links to read later. I once had an email arrive at my gmail account 3 months after I sent it. That's like what 1000 years in internet time? :D
Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
51–60 of 141 posts
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#52In 2120, we'll be reading "votes sent by mail delivered 100 years later".
The post office will have time machine by then to get back and deliver on time and change the temporarily altered history. May be we already living in that alternative branch.
You conjugated the future semiconditionally modified subinverted plagal past subjunctive intentional incorrectly.
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#53Yet strangely enough, the postal service tracking system updated the status about a month ago, from "In Transit" to "In Transit - Arriving Late". Derp, derp.
Anyway, I've pretty much given up on them at this point, but I wonder if like 100 years from now, or at some other arbitrary point in time down the line, somebody who lives here after me is going to find a package of plastic worms in the mailbox...
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We did reach out to the post office for comment and a spokesperson told me, “In most cases these incidents do not involve mail that had been lost in our network and later found. What we typically find is that old letters and postcards – sometimes purchased at flea markets, antique shops and even online – are re-entered into our system. The end result is what we do best – as long as there is a deliverable address an…
> sensationalized headline No, the postmark is 1920 according to the article. See https://i.imgur.com/r8HqDc2.png
The second postmark suggests that this was possibly redeposited into the mail somewhere.
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#55The postmark is obviously printed by a modern (impact?) printer. Why the post office would accept a mailing with incorrect postage for current times is notable - maybe someone making the call just shrugged it off an allowed it to pass.
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#56I ordered a package of plastic worms (for bass fishing) back in June. They were shipped from Texas on 06-21, and as of today (09-10), they still haven't arrived (Chapel Hill, NC). Yet strangely enough, the postal service tracking system updated the status about a month ago, from "In Transit" to "In Transit - Arriving Late". Derp, derp. Anyway, I've pretty much given up on them at this point, but I wonder if like 100…
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#57I ordered a package of plastic worms (for bass fishing) back in June. They were shipped from Texas on 06-21, and as of today (09-10), they still haven't arrived (Chapel Hill, NC). Yet strangely enough, the postal service tracking system updated the status about a month ago, from "In Transit" to "In Transit - Arriving Late". Derp, derp. Anyway, I've pretty much given up on them at this point, but I wonder if like 100…
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> sensationalized headline No, the postmark is 1920 according to the article. See https://i.imgur.com/r8HqDc2.png
Can it not have multiple postmarks? The stamp at the top (which says 1920) and the modern barcode underneath?
Re: Postcard stamped in 1920 delivered 100 years later
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember the USPS is rumored to have recently dismantled hundreds of sorting machines. Entirely possible that some old mail was jammed in there somehow. Also, cf. "Going Postal" by Terry Pratchett.
I had that initial thought as well, but there's no way those machines are anywhere near a century old.