Live data from Hacker News

IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

ifttt.com

11–20 of 66 posts

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#11

" We believe that Pro’s price of $9.99 per month is money well spent. However, because Pro is new and will evolve in response to your feedback, we wanted to provide some payment flexibility. Our introductory set your own price subscription allows you to choose your monthly payment for the first year of Pro. This special offer expires in 4 weeks, on Wednesday, October 7th. " Interesting approach. I wonder what users w…

I look at IFTTT and Zapier and wonder what people use them for. Don't get me wrong, I think both have a target consumer but they feel expensive for what they appear to offer. I feel like if you're investing in automation the agnostic nature of owning and operating the code is more valuable than building into a walled system that relies on Internet connectivity and a SaaS service. OpenFaaS plus some Python could get y…

We used Zapier at a previous startup to automate some gsuite tasks. It's really nice because it comes with monitoring and non-developers can edit/re-configure them if needed. It's expensive but headache free.

You can find huginn[1] & n8n[2] interesting.

https://github.com/huginn/huginn https://n8n.io/

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I look at IFTTT and Zapier and wonder what people use them for. Don't get me wrong, I think both have a target consumer but they feel expensive for what they appear to offer. I feel like if you're investing in automation the agnostic nature of owning and operating the code is more valuable than building into a walled system that relies on Internet connectivity and a SaaS service. OpenFaaS plus some Python could get y…

My main use for IFTTT is that they accept incoming webhooks to send push notifications to my phone via their app. Incredibly useful and convenient.

If that's your only use case - wouldn't Pushbullet (or something similar) be a more complete solution? Genuinely curious.

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#14

" We believe that Pro’s price of $9.99 per month is money well spent. However, because Pro is new and will evolve in response to your feedback, we wanted to provide some payment flexibility. Our introductory set your own price subscription allows you to choose your monthly payment for the first year of Pro. This special offer expires in 4 weeks, on Wednesday, October 7th. " Interesting approach. I wonder what users w…

You can do this yourself. Just ping your lambda functions as if they were webhooks.

The problem with IFTTT has always been speed for me. I had the soccer goal notifications activated once I got my hue lights years ago so that when my team scored itd flash the lights. Usually this happened five minutes after I watched it on the TV. Useless.

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#15

I really, truly don’t mind paying for software, but all of these subscription services cost obscene amounts of money. $10 per month is $120 per year. $120! I might pay that much for boxed software, but it would need to do a heck of a lot more than IFTTT, and I’d expect to get much more than one year of life out of it. Affinity Photo, for instance, cost $60, and VMware Fusion cost $80, to name two products I purchased…

Would you run this boxed software on your machine? Would you maintain it? How much is your time worth?

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#17
post #7

A couple weeks ago, I was looking for some way to convert a Gmail email filter into an Android clock alarm (not just a custom notification) so I can be woken up if a certain email arrives. I haven't found a solution for this. I had heard of IFTTT, so I took a look at the website, but I couldn't make heads or tails of it. I signed up for a free account and I searched through the integrations available, but it didn't s…

What about IFTTT (or equivalent) plus + Tasker + ClockTask?

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#19

I really, truly don’t mind paying for software, but all of these subscription services cost obscene amounts of money. $10 per month is $120 per year. $120! I might pay that much for boxed software, but it would need to do a heck of a lot more than IFTTT, and I’d expect to get much more than one year of life out of it. Affinity Photo, for instance, cost $60, and VMware Fusion cost $80, to name two products I purchased…

Would you run this boxed software on your machine? Would you maintain it? How much is your time worth?

> Would you run this boxed software on your machine?

Yes. Would you rather have ice cream or get punched in the face?

> Would you maintain it?

If maintaining it means scheduling updates through my host's package manager or running docker pull, and not "hey it's thursday, time for a new configuration format", then sure.

> How much is your time worth?

Enough to never host Elasticsearch, not enough to go SaaS-only.

Re: IFTTT introduces IFTTT Pro, free accounts now limited to 3 applets

#20
An aside... I've never really got why technical folks would use IFTTT vs self-hosted. For non-techies I get it... but there are so many great and free tools available e.g. python, tasker/automagic/B4A, node-red, etc, etc.

I'm guessing this move to PRO will drive capable folks away.

Post reply on HN