Live data from Hacker News

Promoted Add-ons Pilot

blog.mozilla.org

21–30 of 138 posts

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#21
Maybe a first step of turning the add-ons into a kind of paid app store? Worked well for some others ;-)

If eventually some kind of payments would be possible, Forefox could transform into a kind of platform and bring completely new possibilities.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#22
post #3

I really like this step, but I think this limitation is quite a shame: "You (or your company) must be based in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Malaysia, or Singapore, because once the pilot ends, we can only accept payment from these countries" I've got two extensions which I'm really fond of: "I don't care about cookies" (1), and its paid version "No thanks" (2). The creator, D…

A bit of a tangent, but I noticed the developer says this on the website:

> By using it, you explicitly allow websites to do whatever they want with cookies they set on your computer (which they mostly do anyway, whether you allow them or not).

Taking GDPR into account, this seems wrong, since GDPR enforces opt-in, not opt-out. Therefore, a notification only gives you an opportunity to opt in and blocking the notification should leave the website with no permissions.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#23
post #22
post #3

I really like this step, but I think this limitation is quite a shame: "You (or your company) must be based in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Malaysia, or Singapore, because once the pilot ends, we can only accept payment from these countries" I've got two extensions which I'm really fond of: "I don't care about cookies" (1), and its paid version "No thanks" (2). The creator, D…

A bit of a tangent, but I noticed the developer says this on the website: > By using it, you explicitly allow websites to do whatever they want with cookies they set on your computer (which they mostly do anyway, whether you allow them or not). Taking GDPR into account, this seems wrong, since GDPR enforces opt-in, not opt-out. Therefore, a notification only gives you an opportunity to opt in and blocking the notific…

GDPR enforces opt in if you read the banner. Not if you hide it.

Sites like Facebook and Ghacks automatically opt you in if you start scrolling down, because they said they would do this in the banner they show. You didn't read it, because you were blocking it with the extension.

The dev is just trying to save himself from silly lawsuits.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#24
post #15
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI, you don't need another extension for the 'Don't care about cookies' Go to the home page and click the 'AdBlock Plus' link to add to uBlock Origin - https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/ 1 less addon with access to all sites you visit. To remove cookie banners permanently on lesser known sites, follow this 30 second guide by the dev - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TvCGWwQr5o

Yes, this addon looks like repackaging and selling someone others open source work. I'm really not sorry for that author.

That's a pretty hefty statement that really needs more than just you thinking so, in my opinion.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#25
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mozilla gets a few hundred million from Google. This may sound like a lot to you but it's pocket change to Google. They spend way more on their own browser as well as getting "free labor from volunteers". There's a reason there's now so few independent browser engines.

A lot of it has to do with how much parties like Google have driven up the complexity of web standards.

In the old days we used to complain about Microsoft for not keeping up with standards and holding the web back.

We can't have it both ways.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#26
post #21

Maybe a first step of turning the add-ons into a kind of paid app store? Worked well for some others ;-) If eventually some kind of payments would be possible, Forefox could transform into a kind of platform and bring completely new possibilities.

It's the opposite of a paid app store. Instead of users paying to download apps, developers are paying to list them.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#27
post #3

I really like this step, but I think this limitation is quite a shame: "You (or your company) must be based in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Malaysia, or Singapore, because once the pilot ends, we can only accept payment from these countries" I've got two extensions which I'm really fond of: "I don't care about cookies" (1), and its paid version "No thanks" (2). The creator, D…

Well, the pilot program will only include 12 addons, so it's highly unlikely that any individual creator will actually get into the pilot.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#28
post #24
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, this addon looks like repackaging and selling someone others open source work. I'm really not sorry for that author.

That's a pretty hefty statement that really needs more than just you thinking so, in my opinion.

That's why I said ''It looks like'' not ''It is''. When you have Ublock this really looks unnecessary.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#29
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of it has to do with how much parties like Google have driven up the complexity of web standards.

In the old days we used to complain about Microsoft for not keeping up with standards and holding the web back. We can't have it both ways.

Aren't you painting it a bit as an either-or situation? It's clear to me that Google is moving towards a web where the browser basically discloses all OS-level APIS on the Javascript level.

But browser makers can pick and choose what they want to implement. And we end users can pick the browers we like.

Re: Promoted Add-ons Pilot

#30
What is the difficulty in accepting payment from more countries. Don't most of the payment providers like Stripe support a broad range of countries.
Post reply on HN