Earlier quoted context omitted.
France also used to have Mont-Saint-Michel, but that one is no more.
Really? I'm went over that causeway a few years ago - what happened?
Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
51–60 of 136 posts
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#52Things that look and feel like something you've done a thousand times, and may do a thousand times again with no danger. Except that sometimes, things can change very quickly. There's a creek bed near me that dried out almost completely over the summer; usually there's some water flow and occasional shallow pools where small fish live. While it was completely dry, I wanted to walk as far downstream as I could. I woke…
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#53In Seattle, the old I90 floating bridge across Lake Washington had a "bulge" where a section of the roadway could be pushed into the bulge to make room for boat passage. When the section was retracted, the highway abruptly ended, and a barrier was put up. The Bulge was infamous for traffic accidents where you suddenly had to swerve right then left then right at highway speed, with narrow lanes lined with concrete wal…
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/6zr2d6...
Picture of the bridge. (I'm EU so couldn't view the previous link)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/5ticw5/til_a_dange...
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's great to hear about these kinds of hidden dangers (immortalized by a wordsworth poem no less), but based on what's stated in the article, the sign shown in one of the photos seems to make the mistake of exhorting without informing (and persuading): > "danger. this pool is very dangerous. submerged rocks. diving, jumping & swimming prohibited." it seems it should say something more like "danger. hidden, swift und…
San Francisco has these signs on Ocean Beach: https://www.flickr.com/photos/c_nilsen/2823013166 They emphasize the concrete fact that people have actually died from the danger, which seems a little closer to your suggestion.
it seems to lack information about when rip currents are most likely, and more to the point, the statistical likelihood of death from entering the water at all.
i'm personally not a strong swimmer so would avoid it anyways, but that information might more readily dissuade others by simply putting trust in the reader to make an appropriate life or death decision.
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#55Things that look and feel like something you've done a thousand times, and may do a thousand times again with no danger. Except that sometimes, things can change very quickly. There's a creek bed near me that dried out almost completely over the summer; usually there's some water flow and occasional shallow pools where small fish live. While it was completely dry, I wanted to walk as far downstream as I could. I woke…
Maybe creeks are different where you're from, but as a young individual in the US northeast the idea of being "swept away never to be seen again" by a creek is a bit comical, torrential rain or not. You'd make it about a few yards before hitting one embankment or other and clamber out. Cold and wet, sure, but certainly to be seen again.
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#56In Seattle, the old I90 floating bridge across Lake Washington had a "bulge" where a section of the roadway could be pushed into the bulge to make room for boat passage. When the section was retracted, the highway abruptly ended, and a barrier was put up. The Bulge was infamous for traffic accidents where you suddenly had to swerve right then left then right at highway speed, with narrow lanes lined with concrete wal…
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#57Things that look and feel like something you've done a thousand times, and may do a thousand times again with no danger. Except that sometimes, things can change very quickly. There's a creek bed near me that dried out almost completely over the summer; usually there's some water flow and occasional shallow pools where small fish live. While it was completely dry, I wanted to walk as far downstream as I could. I woke…
As soon as it started raining, wouldn't you have just gotten out of the creek via the nearest embankment?
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cancelling a public right of way is not easy. If it were, most of them would have disappeared years ago because land owners don't usually appreciate them being there. By the sound of it, the current signage is hardly enticing. But it's an interesting question whether someone might potentially be liable.
Can disuse cause a public right of way to cease existing in the UK?
Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#59Re: Desolate English path has killed more than 100 people (2017)
#60Things that look and feel like something you've done a thousand times, and may do a thousand times again with no danger. Except that sometimes, things can change very quickly. There's a creek bed near me that dried out almost completely over the summer; usually there's some water flow and occasional shallow pools where small fish live. While it was completely dry, I wanted to walk as far downstream as I could. I woke…
Maybe creeks are different where you're from, but as a young individual in the US northeast the idea of being "swept away never to be seen again" by a creek is a bit comical, torrential rain or not. You'd make it about a few yards before hitting one embankment or other and clamber out. Cold and wet, sure, but certainly to be seen again.