Pregnancy/Motherhood groups are swarmed with the same "can you read this, I think I see a faint line" + photo question every single day because of the cheap tests. The strip results are NOT easy to interpret, because you may still see a faint line on the paper when not pregnant, and it's kind of an important emotional question as some couples have been trying to get pregnant for years. Your OB does you a mercy if the…
Perhaps there should be more examples of positive and negative readings in the paper test’s leaflet? Including photos like those that get posted on forums. I know this wouldn’t solve all cases but seems like it could be helpful for some.
Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
151–160 of 161 posts
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
This exactly. I had to convince my wife not to doubt herself. “Yes that’s a line. Instructions say that if anything appears even if faint then you’re pregnant. No we don’t need to double check. Wahoo you’re pregnant!!”
We had the same conversation, followed by at least $30 worth of double-checking over the next several days...
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
We had the same conversation, followed by at least $30 worth of double-checking over the next several days...
That should have started the usually uncomfortable dialog about enrolling in a basic statistics course. It could save your relationship.
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#154As pointed out on the twitter thread. If a digital test is wanted, there's no reason it couldn't accept exactly the kind of disposable strip it contains. That way the part that is going to become ewaste could at least be re-usable.
You'd have to make sure the diodes were exactly lined up with the strip in order to avoid false negatives. That doesn't seem like a risk worth taking to save a few bucks. Maybe some sort of cartridge system could be developed.
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then maybe something needs to be added to the manual: "If the line shows but is faded: retake the test in X days" Or maybe the test can have lines with different sensitivities.
"Fix it in the documentation" is a terrible solution to a UI issue. Fix the UI. When the user makes a mistake it's the user's problem, but the designer's fault.
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
We had the same conversation, followed by at least $30 worth of double-checking over the next several days...
That should have started the usually uncomfortable dialog about enrolling in a basic statistics course. It could save your relationship.
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#157Going over the conversation here I'm a bit surprised by how many people seem to prefer an unnecessarily complicated and obfuscating solution to the straight-forward one. The Twitter thread clearly points out that the electronics serve strictly as an intermediary layer between the paper test and the user. They just binarize the paper reading. This in turn gives a false psychological sense of security ("it's the comput…
The day I figured it out those memories started coming back and it all clicked. I stopped trusting myself after that. I knew I didn't trust myself anymore when my 3 year old son would reference the bus I used to catch by it's color and I didn't know whether he was wrong or I was, so I just kept my mouth shut cos there was a better chance he was right.
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't say super important. I'll probably get down voted for my opinion, but if we had proper sex education for everyone and valued women's health care than this wouldn't be an issue.
I don't think that sex education and accessible abortions stops people from being emotionally invested in finding out if they are pregnant. This can be a stressful question whether you want a child, don't want a child, or don't know!
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#159Pregnancy/Motherhood groups are swarmed with the same "can you read this, I think I see a faint line" + photo question every single day because of the cheap tests. The strip results are NOT easy to interpret, because you may still see a faint line on the paper when not pregnant, and it's kind of an important emotional question as some couples have been trying to get pregnant for years. Your OB does you a mercy if the…
Well yes but the digital test does not give your better info. They translate a non binary result to a binary one. What I did when "we" were doing these tests (got 2 types both paper stips, one high sensitivity and one of the cheapest one) simply compare a unused strip and the one with pee. It's not hard and the manual in the ones I got were really good. Like color pictures and lots of examples.
I’d think these things have minimum standards they must meet and so the cheapest test is just as good as the more marketed (and more expensive) one. Am I missing something?
Re: Digital pregnancy tests have an internal paper test
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think that sex education and accessible abortions stops people from being emotionally invested in finding out if they are pregnant. This can be a stressful question whether you want a child, don't want a child, or don't know!
Teenagers were specifically mentioned in the comment. Good sex education helps because reproduction is now not some mysterious process. They will then be able to make good choices when they decide to sex. Having access to abortion services helps because having sex shouldn't ruin someones life.