Live data from Hacker News

A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

user.eng.umd.edu

51–60 of 286 posts

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#51
post #49

> There is no effective way to find out how to use Unix, other than sitting next to an adept and asking for help That's a rather unfair claim. Hundreds of books and tutorials have been written to introduce people to Unix...

Now.

This was written decades ago, when computers mostly lived in universities and the only way to learn Unix was by etc.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#52

I remain amazed that the #1 shipper of Unix systems today is .. Apple. I grew up on Unix in the 80's, cut my teeth on MIPS RISC/os and then Irix and SunOS and all the joys of the very first days of Linux, oh my .. and I was fully prepared to be an SGI fanboy for the rest of my life - and then, they abandoned Irix and shipped NT. sadface So when the tiBook came out, and it was promised to have a Unix on it, I jumped o…

They made a rather strange o2 laptop that never made it to production.

A number of legendary companies with great potential misstepped, GRiD, Blackberry, Be, MasPar, Thinking Machines, GO corp, Intergraph, heck go back to the Evans & Sutherland LDS-1 in 1969 or when BBN decided not to get into hardware after making the first internet hardware ever, the IMP. Or how about how SRI fumbled the ball after Englebarts work or SDS, who made a bunch of the NASA Apollo hardware.

The world is littered with great technology companies that didn't stick around because we determine success and failure by handshakes on the golf course.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#53

Pretty much each point raised in this post(?) are correct, current and relevant even 26 years later. POSIX is a monolith and really deserves to be improved. It's been around forever, yes. It will probably keep on being around forever, yes. Take the tar command (please!), which is already a nightmare where lower-case `a' means "check first" and upper-case `A' means "delete all my disk files without asking" (or somethi…

Completely agree. One of the problems is of course the freedom of choice a Unix system gives you. Instead of a single shell with a single set of commands, people can pick and mix. For beginners it's a nightmare but for power users it's, in general, very empowering.

Getting help on Unix commands, particularly in Linux, has always been a mess. On most Linux distros, typing "help" will give you help about the shell built-ins. Then, discovering "man", you soon find that the bundled GNU utils of course would rather you use their "info" system, which in turn may refer to a web page(!) for info.

I remember coming from the Amiga to Linux: I would not have gotten far without word-of-mouth help (and helpful computer magazine articles explaining a lot of the particularities of Unix). The Amiga, on the other hand, was a cheap home computer with an exceptionally thick manual detailing every single command clearly and succinctly.

The Open Group has the POSIX util spec published online[0] and also allow free downloads of it for personal use. Since I discovered it, I find myself using it much more often than man pages. I've made a little alias in bash that launches Dillo with the appropriate command page.

[0] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c...

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#54
post #48

Pretty much each point raised in this post(?) are correct, current and relevant even 26 years later. POSIX is a monolith and really deserves to be improved. It's been around forever, yes. It will probably keep on being around forever, yes. Take the tar command (please!), which is already a nightmare where lower-case `a' means "check first" and upper-case `A' means "delete all my disk files without asking" (or somethi…

> POSIX is a monolith and really deserves to be improved. I want it to be improved but I fear it is becoming irrelevant. There are very few OSes left to be compatible with...

It's depressing to think that the Cambrian explosion that lead to a variety of hardware, software, operating systems, and web browsers and great freedom and power for the end user is gradually getting culled and turning into a monoculture of walled gardens and the end users are just getting screwed.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#55

> [the name] Grep suggests to me that the author of this one had been reading too much Robert Heinlein (you grok?), or possibly --- and this is in fact quite likely --- was under the influence of psychotropic substances at the time. As funny as this is, the actual origin for "grep" is even more interesting – and, at least to me, quite mnemonic. "grep" comes from ed, and stands for the command "g/re/p", that is global…

> was under the influence of psychotropic substances at the time

He's saying it as if it's a bad thing?...

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#56

Pretty much each point raised in this post(?) are correct, current and relevant even 26 years later. POSIX is a monolith and really deserves to be improved. It's been around forever, yes. It will probably keep on being around forever, yes. Take the tar command (please!), which is already a nightmare where lower-case `a' means "check first" and upper-case `A' means "delete all my disk files without asking" (or somethi…

The 4 things I love most in Powershell, from the point of view of a maintainer of scripts, is the relative verbosity of commands (at least I don't have to go hunting for obscure acronyms, or recursive puns such as yacc, when I read code), auto-completion an auto-documentation of scripts (when I have to change something), and object pipe (as a maintainer I hate awk and regular expressions in general).

Only defect is they did not go with Yoda speak (Get- is a much worse filter that NetA to search for Get-NetAdapter for instance).

It's still a bit green on Linux environments, but it already beats many of the alternatives.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#57
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Where GREP Came From" by Brian Kernighan from Computerphile: * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTfOnGZUZDk For those unfamiliar, Kernighan is the "K" in K&R C and the "K" in AWK: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Kernighan

Great interview with Brian on Lex Fridman's podcast - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9upVbGSBFo

I listened to that one last night, and then a few more. He's been in rotation for a while now.

I don't know how I ended up subscribing to Lex Fridman's podcast, but it's both wonderful and somewhat bizarre to me.

On the one hand, he comes across as the kind of character you'd expect in a horror film. Meticulous, well-dressed, friendly, but affectless in his speech and oddly emotionless and formal.

But then the actual questions he asks, and the observations he makes, are IMO a step above most interviewers. I can think of a number of 'greater' interviewers, but he's definitely well in the 'very good' range.

My apologies if Fridman reads this comment. I definitely don't want you to stop doing things the way you do :). It's just somewhat different, in a strangely 'boring' way, that I'm not used to from most good podcast hosts that I'm familiar with. Most are, sometimes to the point of irritation, exceedingly affable and chatty.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#58

I remain amazed that the #1 shipper of Unix systems today is .. Apple. I grew up on Unix in the 80's, cut my teeth on MIPS RISC/os and then Irix and SunOS and all the joys of the very first days of Linux, oh my .. and I was fully prepared to be an SGI fanboy for the rest of my life - and then, they abandoned Irix and shipped NT. sadface So when the tiBook came out, and it was promised to have a Unix on it, I jumped o…

They made a rather strange o2 laptop that never made it to production. A number of legendary companies with great potential misstepped, GRiD, Blackberry, Be, MasPar, Thinking Machines, GO corp, Intergraph, heck go back to the Evans & Sutherland LDS-1 in 1969 or when BBN decided not to get into hardware after making the first internet hardware ever, the IMP. Or how about how SRI fumbled the ball after Englebarts work…

Yeah, I saw the Indy-laptop once during a demo in Hollywood .. was definitely a clunky pile of junk.

You're right about that golfing handshake.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but largely (functionally) indistinguishable from a UNIX machine when accessing it via teletype (glass or otherwise). I disagree. I first sat down at a VMS terminal in a library in North Carolina when the OPAC broke and dropped me back to a prompt. I knew Linux passably well at that point but had never used VMS before. I typed ls, tried dir, that worked, and finally tried help. In half an hour I was investigating t…

I just tried 'help' on a linux system. It is absolute garbage.

That's because 'help' on most Linux-based systems is actually a shell builtin which explains other shell builtin commands. This, in turn, is related to the fact that Linux-based systems are flexible - you could use a totally different shell which does not even have the _help_ builtin - while VMS was a comprehensive single-sourced top-down controlled system. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, the fact that you are nearly certain to be using several Linux instances right at this moment gives some indication of which of these systems eventually turned out to be the strongest, warts and all.

Re: A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)

#60
post #49

> There is no effective way to find out how to use Unix, other than sitting next to an adept and asking for help That's a rather unfair claim. Hundreds of books and tutorials have been written to introduce people to Unix...

Now. This was written decades ago, when computers mostly lived in universities and the only way to learn Unix was by etc.

Well it's written in about 1994 by the look of it. So, this is the point where I was learning Unix and it's after the point where a Finnish university student's "hobby project" is building one from scratch, a pretty good one it turns out.

It's also coming either after, or at the same time as books like "The Magic Garden Explained" which explains SVR4 in considerable detail.

You should read stuff like this as at least 90% sour grapes. Is there value from some of the criticisms along the way? Sure, but mostly they're just angry because the thing they liked is clearly going away.

Post reply on HN