Earlier quoted context omitted.
Arguments by appeals to authorities like the FCC, CDC, or FAA sort of work if the authority can be trusted. For the argument to be coherent that trust must have been established by a proven track record of both employing the appropriate methods correctly and showing independence of vested interests in their reporting of the results.
Apparently you have no idea what you are talking about, so you think that these sorts of arguments work when discussing FCC emission testing. The FCC does not actually run the test, they set the standards. The tests themselves are run by various labs and testing agencies that are certified to perform the tests and who would be risking a very lucrative gig for the sake of cheating on a test for a device that will be w…
The summary of the above article is that yes: if you hold the phone sufficiently far away from the measuring device the detected radiation is below the levels mandated, and if someone else tries to test the emission for themselves Apple will say they did it wrong and refuse to give any explanation of what the error might be. A bullet proof system indeed.