Live data from Hacker News

U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

reuters.com

31–40 of 113 posts

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#31
post #10

I'm sure they'll stop all their illegal surveillance any day now.

Illegal Memory access at 0xDEADBEEF

Watching_the_watchmen_recursive has detected a stackoverflow and was aborted.

A core dump has been created and can be viewed at constituion.hex.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#32
post #20
post #2

Time to give a massive apology and a full pardon to Mr Snowden then.

Having read Barton Gellman’s book that describes and alludes to some of the details of what were in the actual (never published) Snowden files, I do not believe that the US IC would let him continue to live, even if he were fully pardoned. I doubt it will ever be safe for him in the US again, despite his legal status.

They wouldn't kill him, that would be an amateurish mistake, you would have a martyr. Destroying his reputation, pressure friends and family...

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#33
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now would be about the best time for him to make that move. With elections upcoming and all that.

Trump's pardoning of Snowden would lose more presidential election support than it would win. Sure, there are plenty of people who would support the decision to pardon Snowden, but I can't see them being the type of people to vote for Trump based on that. Existing Trump supporters, on the other hand, I could see "punishing" Trump for his weakness in pardoning a "traitor who fled to Russia".

Eh... the old neocons aren't the same breed of conservative that is the Trump supporters. They seem very much in favour of pardoning Snowden.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#34

Since there are multiple comments about how the US government must/should pardon Snowden now, I'd like to make a top level comment to clarify some things about how this does not obligate the government to change his status. 1. The court only found that a single program exposed by Snowden was illegal. Snowden released a bunch of other information that was a violation of the NDA he signed when he was given a security c…

I think this is true and that is why fleeing to Russia was the correct choice. Because the whistle blower channels don't work.

Just for additional clarity, Russia wasn’t his first choice. It was somewhere in South America. US decided to ground him in Russia (best optics for them really)

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#35

Since there are multiple comments about how the US government must/should pardon Snowden now, I'd like to make a top level comment to clarify some things about how this does not obligate the government to change his status. 1. The court only found that a single program exposed by Snowden was illegal. Snowden released a bunch of other information that was a violation of the NDA he signed when he was given a security c…

I think this is true and that is why fleeing to Russia was the correct choice. Because the whistle blower channels don't work.

Russia was probably his only choice. Every other country would have extradited him.

I doubt he is happy with having to live in Russia - the main benefactor of his leaks. It's impossible to imagine that he is able to reconcile his hatred of US spying with the malicious actions of the government he now relies on for protection.

...and that's the ultimate crux of this whole thing. When you go up against the US government, you have to ask yourself - is there any major world power out there that's better?

I don't think he asked himself that question.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#37
post #4

Will Trump pardon Snowden? that will be interesting.

Trump's base is very pro-military and a lot of them believe that Snowden put military lives at risk (and also confuse him with Chelsea Manning / Julian Assange). So I don't see how that could ever happen.

That might prevent it from happening before the election, but win or lose he's still President between November and January and win or lose this is his last election.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#38
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now would be about the best time for him to make that move. With elections upcoming and all that.

Trump's pardoning of Snowden would lose more presidential election support than it would win. Sure, there are plenty of people who would support the decision to pardon Snowden, but I can't see them being the type of people to vote for Trump based on that. Existing Trump supporters, on the other hand, I could see "punishing" Trump for his weakness in pardoning a "traitor who fled to Russia".

The media and the DNC would spin it as proof Trump is controlled by Russia. That's far more certain than some Republican voters disagreeing with the idea after considering this judgment.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is true and that is why fleeing to Russia was the correct choice. Because the whistle blower channels don't work.

Russia was probably his only choice. Every other country would have extradited him. I doubt he is happy with having to live in Russia - the main benefactor of his leaks. It's impossible to imagine that he is able to reconcile his hatred of US spying with the malicious actions of the government he now relies on for protection. ...and that's the ultimate crux of this whole thing. When you go up against the US governmen…

Perhaps he didn't go against the government but went in support of the US citizens and believed what the government did was wrong.

Re: U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

#40
Crimes are no issue for the persecution of Snowden.

Clapper lied, on camera, under oath, admitted it and has had zero consequences. Kept his job. Has not had to defend a prosecution. Now he's using is former position and influence to get rich. It's lawbreaking from the top. Nothing to discuss about it.

Sadly the rule of law and equality before it is a thing that needs to be re-established.

Post reply on HN