Live data from Hacker News

Why I Actively Discourage Online Tooling like jwt.io and Online JSON Validators

jvt.me

1–10 of 170 posts

Re: Why I Actively Discourage Online Tooling like jwt.io and Online JSON Validators

#4

I use python -mjson.tool to validate JSON. And JQ to query it. TLDR Don't use online services, you have no idea what they're doing with your data and if they run the open source version they say they do.

Or rather like with most online services, only feed them data you're comfortable with being shared to everyone.

Re: Why I Actively Discourage Online Tooling like jwt.io and Online JSON Validators

#5

I use python -mjson.tool to validate JSON. And JQ to query it. TLDR Don't use online services, you have no idea what they're doing with your data and if they run the open source version they say they do.

I find these services useful when I first start using a format with test data. Then I usually look for something local for long term use.

Re: Why I Actively Discourage Online Tooling like jwt.io and Online JSON Validators

#7

I agree with the premise though its easy to validate if these tools are sending data to a remote dest with the network activity developer tool in any of the major browsers.

Sure, but to be sure you’d have to validate it every time, because the site’s content may have changed since your last visit. Do you?

Re: Why I Actively Discourage Online Tooling like jwt.io and Online JSON Validators

#9
post #6

But using google, slack, skype, gitlab, bitbucket... is fine to send sensitive data?

No, it definitely isn't. Github (and probably others) will show you big scary warning messages if you commit things like AWS keys.
Post reply on HN