Live data from Hacker News

Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

thedrive.com

371–380 of 486 posts

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Glassdoor says they earn $30k - $64k yet lots of us earn more in our comfy office jobs typing code into a text editor, kinda puts things into perspective.

It's amazing how much leverage an employer has when they have the legal right to simply fire everyone, and there is no recourse for the employees because the employer is the federal government itself. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/05/reagan-fires-11-00...

Or Mozilla

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#372
post #362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Glassdoor says they earn $30k - $64k yet lots of us earn more in our comfy office jobs typing code into a text editor, kinda puts things into perspective.

I think glassdoor is full of shit. https://123atc.com/salary More like 70-180, and then the potential for significant overtime as well.

This makes way more sense. From the person I knew in ATC a while back, it actually paid pretty well.

Plus you're a federal employee, so the benefits tend to be quite good and make up for a lower salary.

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#374
post #372
post #362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think glassdoor is full of shit. https://123atc.com/salary More like 70-180, and then the potential for significant overtime as well.

This makes way more sense. From the person I knew in ATC a while back, it actually paid pretty well. Plus you're a federal employee, so the benefits tend to be quite good and make up for a lower salary.

I know all the ATC types I knew in the military were looking at pretty lucrative careers when they left active duty.

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't seem to find a source, I heard about a culture (maybe Japanese?) where suicide by train is rare because of the inconvenience it causes others and the shame that brings your family. When you go through the math on lost productivity due to train delays, you get some interesting conclusions. If a commuter train has 1,000 passengers making an average of $50 per hour who are, a delay is $833 per minute. That means…

According to wikipedia, suicide by train is common in Japan. In an effort to suppress this, life insurance policies often refuse to pay out for suicide by train and surviving family members may be fined. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_methods#Rail

Japanese train stations also have soothing blue lights to prevent suicide and specially created jingles that are supposed to calm people down.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-22/the-amazi...

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#376

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even the Helicopter may not be necessary if you can start with a BASE jump. Or set up a catapult.

Preferably an ACME catapult.

No. Their products are terrible, please, just trust me, I've tried them all.

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are youtube videos of ATC recordings (with transcripts) of pilots losing their cool. You are right, I don't think any ATC lost their cool in any of the recordings I've listened to. This quote from the article made me smile: >> Another pilot chimed in: "Only in LA."

Not ATC but here's a classic viral recording of a frazzled ground controller herding cats at JFK airport in NY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BMDkwfkXv0

Kennedy Steve is pretty famous (now retired). There's an interview with him on YouTube that's neat.

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whenever I watch this video and the other jetman videos I can't help but try to find anomalies or something wrong in the video to somehow try and prove that it is CGI (which I know it's not).

Same. I studied aerospace engineering and know that small-scale jetpack flight is possible to do, and yet I cannot help but scan for weird lighting changes or lens incongruities whenever I see a video. It's so insane to see these things.

How does this not burn his legs off?

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#379
post #369
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct, people keep repeating this story - it's false. I know controllers who have actually controlled the U2 and SR71 and they've explained why it's not true (they don't use the same freq, etc.). Also Brian Shul (the originator of this anecdote) and his RSO were the only SR71 crew removed from the program. There is a reason for that.

The SR-71's top speed is still classified to this day, partly because they probably still don't know what it was, because nobody ever got one there. Shul's plane was cruising probably far below max speed (the number wasn't 1942, I don't remember exactly what he said it was). As to "not using the same freq", military aircraft have radios with knobs that turn. They can certainly monitor and talk on civilian frequencies…

They used UHF to talk to ATC.

Related post: https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/archive/index.php/t-56350...

Re: Airline pilots landing at LAX report “a guy in jetpack” flying alongside them

#380

Reminds me of lawn chair Larry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawnchair_Larry_flight

Considering someone would have had to surreptitiously home-brew a jet pack rivalling the Yves Rossi Jetman in order to get to that altitude, I would not be surprised if this turned out to be a balloon "dressed up" to look like a person with a jetpack.
Post reply on HN